Sandra R. Georgetti
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rúbia CasagrandeWaldiceu A. VerriMarcela M. BaracatMaria José Vieira FonsecaRenata M. MartínezFabiana T. M. C. VicentiniFelipe A. Pinho‐RibeiroAna C. Zarpelon
- Topics
- Skin Protection and Aging (25 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers)Bee Products Chemical Analysis (14 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryDermatologyFood Science
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Sandra R. Georgetti
70 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Food Science 803
- Molecular Biology 693
- Biochemistry 641
- Dermatology 547
- Plant Science 450
Countries citing papers authored by Sandra R. Georgetti
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra R. Georgetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra R. Georgetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra R. Georgetti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra R. Georgetti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra R. Georgetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra R. Georgetti. The network helps show where Sandra R. Georgetti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra R. Georgetti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra R. Georgetti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra R. Georgetti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra R. Georgetti. Sandra R. Georgetti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 80 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | Avaliação da Qualidade de Formulações Manipuladas e Industrializadas de Sinvastatina | 2 |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 229 |
About Sandra R. Georgetti
Sandra R. Georgetti is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Dermatology and Insect Science, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin Protection and Aging (25 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (641 citations), Dermatology (547 citations) and Food Science (803 citations). Sandra R. Georgetti has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Rúbia Casagrande, Waldiceu A. Verri, Marcela M. Baracat, Maria José Vieira Fonseca, Renata M. Martínez, Fabiana T. M. C. Vicentini, Felipe A. Pinho‐Ribeiro, Ana C. Zarpelon, Victor Fattori and Josiane Alessandra Vignoli. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.