Antônio C. Santos

95 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Antônio C. Santos
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 936
  • Biochemistry 303
  • Pharmacology 321
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 285
  • Biological Psychiatry 70
Replace Şükrü Öter with:
Şükrü Öter Türkiye
Kazim Husain United States
Hakan Parlakpınar Türkiye
Omar Noel Medina‐Campos Mexico
L. W. Oberley United States
Aglaia Pappa Greece
Hyun‐Ock Pae South Korea
Eun‐Jung Park South Korea
Varman T. Samuel United States
Jin‐Song Bian China
Antônio C. Santos relative to Şükrü Öter Türkiye Şükrü Öter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Şükrü Öter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Antônio C. Santos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antônio C. Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antônio C. Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antônio C. Santos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antônio C. Santos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antônio C. Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antônio C. Santos. The network helps show where Antônio C. Santos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antônio C. Santos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Antônio C. Santos Line = papers co-authored together Antônio C. Santos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012315
2 2008298
3 2007272
4 2006229
5 2007180
6 1998163
7 2005156
8 2011147
9 2007142
10 2019140
11 2003136
12 2005135
13 201585
14 199783
15 199682
16 200873
17 201372
18 200270
19 200069
20 200269

About Antônio C. Santos

Antônio C. Santos is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (12 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (11 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (7 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (7 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (936 citations), Biochemistry (303 citations), Pharmacology (321 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (285 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (70 citations). Antônio C. Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Cuba and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neife Aparecida Guinaim dos Santos, Carlos Curti, Nádia Maria Martins, Sérgio Akira Uyemura, Fábio Ermínio Mingatto, Maria Augusta Carvalho Rodrigues, M.L.P. Bianchi, Daniel Junqueira Dorta, Rafaela Scalco Ferreira and Tiago Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as Chemico-Biological Interactions, Toxicology in Vitro, Neurotoxicity Research, Food and Chemical Toxicology and The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact