Sandra Prince‐Embury
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Donald H. SaklofskeJames F. RooneyTroy CourvilleRobert A. SteerDavid NordstokkeClaire A. WilsonRachel A. PlouffeGuido Makransky
- Topics
- Resilience and Mental Health (20 papers)Risk Perception and Management (10 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Sandra Prince‐Embury
32 papers receiving 596 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Clinical Psychology 487
- Social Psychology 145
- Sociology and Political Science 122
- Safety Research 110
- Applied Psychology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Prince‐Embury
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Prince‐Embury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Prince‐Embury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Prince‐Embury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Prince‐Embury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Prince‐Embury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Prince‐Embury. The network helps show where Sandra Prince‐Embury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Prince‐Embury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Prince‐Embury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Prince‐Embury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Prince‐Embury. Sandra Prince‐Embury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 92 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 94 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Identity Status in Politically Active Pro and Anti ERA Women | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Sandra Prince‐Embury
Sandra Prince‐Embury is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (20 papers), Risk Perception and Management (10 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (487 citations), Applied Psychology (85 citations) and Safety Research (110 citations). Sandra Prince‐Embury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donald H. Saklofske, James F. Rooney, Troy Courville, Robert A. Steer, David Nordstokke, Claire A. Wilson, Rachel A. Plouffe, Guido Makransky, Stefan Sütterlin and Annamaria Di Fabio. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Traumatic Stress.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.