Samuel Sponem

1.0k total citations
34 papers, 580 citations indexed

About

Samuel Sponem is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Samuel Sponem has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 580 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Management Information Systems, 11 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 9 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Samuel Sponem's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (21 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (8 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers). Samuel Sponem is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (21 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (8 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers). Samuel Sponem collaborates with scholars based in France, Canada and Luxembourg. Samuel Sponem's co-authors include Caroline Lambert, Claire Dambrin, Stéphanie Chatelain-Ponroy, Jérémy Moralès, Christine Musselin, Anne Rousseau, Philippe Eynaud, Caroline Aubé, Yuri Biondi and Claude Francœur and has published in prestigious journals such as Organization Studies, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Samuel Sponem

31 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Samuel Sponem France 11 330 179 165 114 109 34 580
Claire Dambrin France 10 171 0.5× 105 0.6× 169 1.0× 60 0.5× 137 1.3× 23 426
Sven Siverbo Sweden 16 373 1.1× 129 0.7× 137 0.8× 140 1.2× 86 0.8× 38 629
Martin Carlsson‐Wall Sweden 11 293 0.9× 126 0.7× 160 1.0× 122 1.1× 108 1.0× 23 523
Marie‐Soleil Tremblay Canada 9 179 0.5× 333 1.9× 129 0.8× 211 1.9× 68 0.6× 15 623
Vaughan S. Radcliffe Canada 18 543 1.6× 485 2.7× 196 1.2× 173 1.5× 170 1.6× 36 985
Thierry Viale Canada 4 97 0.3× 57 0.3× 211 1.3× 100 0.9× 108 1.0× 5 448
Tobias Scheytt Austria 8 163 0.5× 157 0.9× 154 0.9× 157 1.4× 98 0.9× 9 544
Christopher Humphrey United Kingdom 8 429 1.3× 164 0.9× 107 0.6× 161 1.4× 109 1.0× 19 791
Kelum Jayasinghe United Kingdom 12 164 0.5× 140 0.8× 58 0.4× 90 0.8× 105 1.0× 33 469
Kim Soin United Kingdom 9 239 0.7× 180 1.0× 188 1.1× 190 1.7× 88 0.8× 14 616

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Sponem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Sponem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Sponem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Sponem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Sponem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Sponem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Sponem. The network helps show where Samuel Sponem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel Sponem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel Sponem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel Sponem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel Sponem. Samuel Sponem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Moralès, Jérémy, et al.. (2024). Artificial imaginaries: Generative AIs as an advanced form of capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 99. 102723–102723. 3 indexed citations
3.
Sponem, Samuel, et al.. (2022). Kaleidoscopic collegiality and the use of performance research metrics. The case of French universities. Higher Education. 85(4). 887–918. 9 indexed citations
4.
Aubé, Caroline, et al.. (2021). Ethical leadership and corporate board effectiveness: The role of team reflexivity and environmental dynamism.. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice. 25(4). 288–302. 6 indexed citations
5.
Sponem, Samuel, et al.. (2020). The impact of the budget process on budgetary slack: The moderating role of uncertainty avoidance and individualism. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit. Tome 26(2). 45–87. 2 indexed citations
6.
Berland, Nicolas, E. Mark Curtis, & Samuel Sponem. (2018). Exposing organizational tensions with a non-traditional budgeting system. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 19(1). 122–140. 6 indexed citations
7.
Francœur, Claude, et al.. (2018). What do we know about what is going on inside the boardroom?. Team Performance Management. 24(5/6). 250–264. 6 indexed citations
8.
Moralès, Jérémy & Samuel Sponem. (2016). You too can have a critical perspective! 25 years of Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 43. 149–166. 42 indexed citations
9.
Rousseau, Anne, et al.. (2015). Le gestionnaire public en question. La difficile conciliation des logiques bureaucratique et managériale.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 14 indexed citations
10.
Sponem, Samuel & Caroline Lambert. (2010). Budgeting Practices, Roles, and Criticisms of the Budget: Perception of CFOs and Management Accountants. 16(1). 159–194. 1 indexed citations
11.
Berland, Nicolas, et al.. (2009). On ne gère bien que ce que l’on mesure. Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine). 1 indexed citations
12.
Moralès, Jérémy & Samuel Sponem. (2009). Rationaliser, dominer, discipliner. Une revue des recherches critiques en contrôle de gestion. Explore Bristol Research. 4 indexed citations
13.
Chatelain-Ponroy, Stéphanie & Samuel Sponem. (2008). Comme l'entreprise l'État doit adopter une culture du résultat. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 257–267. 1 indexed citations
14.
Eynaud, Philippe, et al.. (2008). Usages des dispositifs de gestion : entre conformité et innovations. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 203–214. 1 indexed citations
15.
Sponem, Samuel, et al.. (2008). Le managerialisme et les associations. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 111–129. 6 indexed citations
16.
Gond, Jean‐Pascal, et al.. (2007). Wrapping Illegitimate Creative Organizations to make them Legitimate? An ethnographic exploration of strategies deployed by Artistic Squats in Paris to acquire legitimacy. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 2 indexed citations
17.
Chatelain-Ponroy, Stéphanie & Samuel Sponem. (2007). Evolutions et permanence du contrôle de gestion. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 12–18. 2 indexed citations
18.
Dambrin, Claire, Caroline Lambert, & Samuel Sponem. (2006). Control and Change - Analysing the Process of Institutionalisation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
19.
Chatelain-Ponroy, Stéphanie, et al.. (2006). Les pratiques des établissements d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en matière de pilotage et de contrôle de gestion. 1. Les outils. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 43–46. 1 indexed citations
20.
Sponem, Samuel. (2004). Contrôle budgétaire diagnostic ou interactif ? Proposition d'un instrument de mesure. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026