Sally Sedgwick
- Philosophy top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Terry PinkardMatthias HaaseJames KreinesCatherine MalabouBéatrice LonguenesseDaniel BreazealeGünter ZöllerHenry E. Allison
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (13 papers)War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sally Sedgwick
25 papers receiving 242 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Philosophy 227
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- Political Science and International Relations 61
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Sally Sedgwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Sally Sedgwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sally Sedgwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sally Sedgwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sally Sedgwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sally Sedgwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sally Sedgwick. The network helps show where Sally Sedgwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sally Sedgwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sally Sedgwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sally Sedgwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sally Sedgwick. Sally Sedgwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Hegel's Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity | 11 |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | Hegel's Critique of Kant's Empiricism and the Categorical Imperative | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Sally Sedgwick
Sally Sedgwick is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Social Sciences and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (13 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (227 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations) and General Social Sciences (17 citations). Sally Sedgwick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Terry Pinkard, Matthias Haase, James Kreines, Catherine Malabou, Béatrice Longuenesse, Daniel Breazeale, Günter Zöller, Henry E. Allison, Paul Guyer and Kenneth R. Westphal. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly and The Monist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.