James Kreines

641 total citations
20 papers, 239 citations indexed

About

James Kreines is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, James Kreines has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 239 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in James Kreines's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (16 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers). James Kreines is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (16 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers). James Kreines collaborates with scholars based in United States. James Kreines's co-authors include Catherine Malabou, Matthias Haase and Sally Sedgwick and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy Compass.

In The Last Decade

James Kreines

19 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

James Kreines
P. J. E. Kail United Kingdom
Aaron M. Griffith United States
Arthur Melnick United States
Lisa Shabel United States
P. J. E. Kail United Kingdom
James Kreines
Citations per year, relative to James Kreines James Kreines (= 1×) peers P. J. E. Kail

Countries citing papers authored by James Kreines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kreines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kreines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kreines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kreines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kreines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kreines. The network helps show where James Kreines may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Kreines

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Kreines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Kreines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Kreines. James Kreines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Kreines, James. (2022). For a Dialectic-First Approach to Kant’sCritique of Pure Reason. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 490–509.
3.
Kreines, James. (2019). Aristotelian Priority, Metaphysical Definitions of God and Hegel on Pure Thought as Absolute. 41(1). 19–39. 4 indexed citations
5.
Kreines, James. (2018). Systematicity and Philosophical Interpretation: Hegel, Pippin, and Changing Debates. Australasian Philosophical Review. 2(4). 393–402. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kreines, James. (2017). The Metaphysics of Reason and Hegel's Logic. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kreines, James. (2017). Kant on the Laws of Nature: Restrictive Inflationism and Its Philosophical Advantages. The Monist. 100(3). 326–341. 7 indexed citations
8.
Kreines, James. (2017). From Objectivity to the Absolute Idea in Hegel’s Logic. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
9.
Kreines, James. (2016). Things in Themselves and Metaphysical Grounding: On Allais'Manifest Reality. European Journal of Philosophy. 24(1). 253–266. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kreines, James. (2015). Reason in the World: Hegel's Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. 31 indexed citations
11.
Kreines, James. (2015). Reason in the World. Oxford University Press eBooks. 59 indexed citations
12.
Kreines, James, et al.. (2013). The Freedom of Life: Hegelian Perspectives. Open Access at Essex (University of Essex). 16 indexed citations
13.
Kreines, James. (2008). Hegel: Metaphysics without Pre-Critical Monism. 57. 6 indexed citations
14.
Kreines, James. (2008). Kant on the Laws of Nature: Laws, Necessitation, and the Limitation of Our Knowledge. European Journal of Philosophy. 17(4). 527–558. 19 indexed citations
16.
Kreines, James. (2007). Between the Bounds of Experience and Divine Intuition: Kant's Epistemic Limits and Hegel's Ambitions. Inquiry. 50(3). 306–334. 9 indexed citations
17.
Kreines, James. (2006). Hegel's Metaphysics: Changing the Debate. Philosophy Compass. 1(5). 466–480. 31 indexed citations
18.
Kreines, James. (2006). Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. The Philosophical Review. 115(1). 112–115. 3 indexed citations
19.
Kreines, James. (2005). The Inexplicability of Kant’s Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 87(3). 11 indexed citations
20.
Kreines, James. (2004). Hegel's Critique of Pure Mechanism and the Philosophical Appeal of theLogicProject. European Journal of Philosophy. 12(1). 38–74. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026