Béatrice Longuenesse
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Kenneth R. WestphalCharles T. WolfePaul GuyerHenry E. AllisonKarl AmeriksAllen W. WoodRobert B. PippinRalph C. S. Walker
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Philosophical ReviewThe Journal of Philosophy
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Béatrice Longuenesse
27 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Philosophy 625
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 306
- History and Philosophy of Science 221
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Countries citing papers authored by Béatrice Longuenesse
This map shows the geographic impact of Béatrice Longuenesse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Béatrice Longuenesse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Béatrice Longuenesse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Béatrice Longuenesse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Béatrice Longuenesse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Béatrice Longuenesse. The network helps show where Béatrice Longuenesse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Béatrice Longuenesse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Béatrice Longuenesse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Béatrice Longuenesse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Béatrice Longuenesse. Béatrice Longuenesse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 47 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 103 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Hegel et la critique de la métaphysique : étude sur la doctrine de l'essence | 0 |
About Béatrice Longuenesse
Béatrice Longuenesse is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (625 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (221 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (306 citations). Béatrice Longuenesse has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth R. Westphal, Charles T. Wolfe, Paul Guyer, Henry E. Allison, Karl Ameriks, Allen W. Wood, Robert B. Pippin, Ralph C. S. Walker, Pauline Kleingeld and Lisa Shabel. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.