Ruth Webber

44 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Ruth Webber
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Health 137
  • Clinical Psychology 183
  • Demography 93
  • Safety Research 63
  • Education 204
Replace Aurora P. Jackson with:
Aurora P. Jackson United States
Douglas A. Abbott United States
Wayne H. Bylsma United States
Charles Waldegrave New Zealand
Natti Ronel Israel
Moncrieff Cochran United States
Ronit D. Leichtentritt Israel
Janet Chang United States
Teppo Kröger Finland
Sharon E. Moore United States
Ruth Webber relative to Aurora P. Jackson United States Aurora P. Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Aurora P. Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Webber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Webber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Webber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Webber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Webber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Webber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Webber. The network helps show where Ruth Webber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Webber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Webber Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Webber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Spirit of Generation Y: Young People's Spirituality in a Changing Australia
200867
2 201063
3 200851
4 201250
5 201344
6 201041
7 201433
8 201030
9 201124
10 200424
11 200523
12 201419
13 200719
14 200516
15 201316
16 201211
17 201310
18
Volunteering among Australian adolescents : Findings from a national study
20119
19 19889
20 20038

About Ruth Webber

Ruth Webber is a scholar working on Health, Public Administration, Demography, Safety Research and Religious studies, having authored 51 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (6 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (137 citations), Clinical Psychology (183 citations), Demography (93 citations), Safety Research (63 citations) and Education (204 citations). Ruth Webber has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Bowers, Christine Bigby, Andrew Singleton, Michael Mason, Lindsay Smith, John DeFrain, Kate E. Jones, Carmel Seibold, Michelle Morris and Christopher F. Sharpley. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Social Work, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research and International Journal of Children s Spirituality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact