Ruth Schofield
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Cheryl ForchukRuta ValaitisRuth Martin‐MisenerElsabeth JensenAndrea ChircopCatherine Ward‐GriffinNoori Akhtar‐DaneshCynthia Baker
- Topics
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers)Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers)Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNurse Education TodayWestern Journal of Nursing Research
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Ruth Schofield
26 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- General Health Professions 182
- Clinical Psychology 66
- Sociology and Political Science 49
- Education 35
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 35
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Schofield
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Schofield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Schofield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Schofield. The network helps show where Ruth Schofield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Schofield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Schofield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Schofield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Schofield. Ruth Schofield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Comparing Personal Health Practices: Individuals with mental illness and the general Canadian population. | 1 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Bridging the discharge process. | 19 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ruth Schofield
Ruth Schofield is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 27 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations), Research and Theory (16 citations) and General Health Professions (182 citations). Ruth Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl Forchuk, Ruta Valaitis, Ruth Martin‐Misener, Elsabeth Jensen, Andrea Chircop, Catherine Ward‐Griffin, Noori Akhtar‐Danesh, Cynthia Baker, Susan Duncan and Jane Underwood. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nurse Education Today and Western Journal of Nursing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.