Jane Tyerman

795 total citations
44 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Jane Tyerman is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Tyerman has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Physiology, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Tyerman's work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (27 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers) and Nursing education and management (6 papers). Jane Tyerman is often cited by papers focused on Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (27 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers) and Nursing education and management (6 papers). Jane Tyerman collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Tyerman's co-authors include Marian Luctkar‐Flude, Leslie Graham, Sue Coffey, Kim Sears, Kevin Woo, Deborah Tregunno, Erin Ziegler, Barbara Wilson-Keates, Cynthia Baker and Dianne Groll and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Education Today and BMC Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Jane Tyerman

37 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Tyerman Canada 13 279 105 98 89 68 44 488
Daria Romaniuk Canada 14 360 1.3× 103 1.0× 146 1.5× 140 1.6× 59 0.9× 20 611
Desiree A. Díaz United States 14 207 0.7× 137 1.3× 140 1.4× 60 0.7× 42 0.6× 56 484
Jeanette Ignacio Singapore 15 206 0.7× 133 1.3× 135 1.4× 98 1.1× 34 0.5× 31 567
Beth Rodgers United States 11 245 0.9× 110 1.0× 135 1.4× 81 0.9× 58 0.9× 20 504
Kirstyn Kameg United States 10 399 1.4× 200 1.9× 176 1.8× 87 1.0× 91 1.3× 20 632
Carol Norton Australia 8 213 0.8× 150 1.4× 199 2.0× 156 1.8× 100 1.5× 10 602
Lorretta Krautscheid United States 11 111 0.4× 221 2.1× 154 1.6× 73 0.8× 77 1.1× 19 478
Amy Jones United States 9 152 0.5× 82 0.8× 73 0.7× 46 0.5× 33 0.5× 26 383
Krista A. White United States 9 116 0.4× 128 1.2× 103 1.1× 76 0.9× 47 0.7× 22 387
Ασπασία Παναγιώτου Greece 8 133 0.5× 140 1.3× 67 0.7× 38 0.4× 49 0.7× 16 364

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Tyerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Tyerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Tyerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Tyerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Tyerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Tyerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Tyerman. The network helps show where Jane Tyerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Tyerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Tyerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Tyerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Tyerman. Jane Tyerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, Kevin Woo, Barbara Wilson-Keates, et al.. (2025). Development of virtual simulation games about wound assessment and management for nurses and nursing students. Teaching and learning in nursing. 20(4). 406–411.
3.
Tyerman, Jane, et al.. (2024). The Perceived Effectiveness of a Suicide Assessment Virtual Simulation Module for Undergraduate Nursing Students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 89. 101509–101509. 3 indexed citations
4.
Killam, Laura A., et al.. (2024). Virtual screen-based clinical simulation: An integrative review of student experiences. Teaching and learning in nursing. 19(2). e359–e368. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fullerton, Madison M., Sherilyn K. D. Houle, James D. Kellner, et al.. (2024). Development and evaluation of virtual simulation games to increase the confidence and self-efficacy of healthcare learners in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion. BMC Medical Education. 24(1). 190–190. 4 indexed citations
6.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, Jane Tyerman, & Monica Larocque. (2024). Pre-simulation Preparation Preferences of Senior Nursing Students: Virtual Simulation Games Versus Traditional Case Studies. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 91. 101545–101545. 2 indexed citations
7.
Rogers, Beth, Laura A. Killam, Kelly Foltz-Ramos, et al.. (2024). Prioritizing Simulation Facilitators’ Competencies for Professional Development Using Q-Methodology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 90. 101527–101527. 2 indexed citations
9.
Killam, Laura A., et al.. (2024). Partnering with Persons Living with Bipolar Disorder to Develop an Authentic Virtual Simulation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 46(1). 20–28.
10.
Killam, Laura A., Marian Luctkar‐Flude, & Jane Tyerman. (2023). Shaping Social Justice Values Through Inclusive Assessment and Debriefing of eLearning Modules. Journal of Nursing Education. 63(1). 48–52. 3 indexed citations
11.
Tyerman, Jane, et al.. (2023). Mutuality in nurse-caregiver relationships in pediatric nursing: A concept analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 70. 26–33. 4 indexed citations
12.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, et al.. (2022). Exploring the effect of neurofeedback on postcancer cognitive impairment and fatigue: A pilot feasibility study. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal. 32(2). 214–222.
13.
Ziegler, Erin, et al.. (2021). Development of an online educational toolkit for sexual orientation and gender identity minority nursing care. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 29. e3470–e3470. 10 indexed citations
14.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, et al.. (2021). Effectiveness of Debriefing Methods for Virtual Simulation: A Systematic Review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 57. 18–30. 36 indexed citations
15.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, et al.. (2020). Developing a Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Nursing Education Toolkit. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 51(9). 412–419. 20 indexed citations
16.
Tyerman, Jane, et al.. (2019). Design and Development of a Virtual Game as Pre-Simulation Preparation for 4th Year BScN Students. 1 indexed citations
17.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, et al.. (2019). Innovations in Nursing Education: Virtual Simulation Games Versus Traditional Case Studies for Presimulation Preparation.
18.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, Jane Tyerman, & Dianne Groll. (2018). Exploring the Use of Neurofeedback by Cancer Survivors: Results of Interviews with Neurofeedback Providers and Clients. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 6(1). 35–42. 8 indexed citations
19.
Luctkar‐Flude, Marian, et al.. (2017). Comparing Instructor-Led Versus Student-Led Simulation Facilitation Methods for Novice Nursing Students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 13(6). 264–269. 10 indexed citations
20.
Tyerman, Jane, et al.. (2016). Pre-simulation preparation and briefing practices for healthcare professionals and students. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 14(8). 80–89. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026