Jane Underwood

460 total citations
21 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Jane Underwood is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Underwood has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 4 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Jane Underwood's work include Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers). Jane Underwood is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers). Jane Underwood collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Jane Underwood's co-authors include Donna Ciliska, Andrea Baumann, Maureen Dobbins, Jennifer Blythe, Ginny Brunton, Jenny Ploeg, Noori Akhtar‐Danesh, S Isaacs, Donna Meagher‐Stewart and Paula Mastrilli and has published in prestigious journals such as Nursing Research, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Canadian Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Jane Underwood

21 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Underwood Canada 12 248 78 55 44 42 21 358
Irmajean Bajnok Canada 12 311 1.3× 112 1.4× 28 0.5× 58 1.3× 73 1.7× 30 469
Agnes Black Canada 10 273 1.1× 83 1.1× 39 0.7× 15 0.3× 47 1.1× 27 372
Margaret Rodan United States 11 235 0.9× 144 1.8× 76 1.4× 9 0.2× 68 1.6× 14 441
Kenneth Sellick Australia 10 171 0.7× 70 0.9× 74 1.3× 53 1.2× 30 0.7× 14 344
Maria De Lá Ó Ramallo Veríssimo Brazil 13 275 1.1× 67 0.9× 49 0.9× 26 0.6× 35 0.8× 86 500
Marian C. Turkel United States 14 365 1.5× 127 1.6× 53 1.0× 26 0.6× 153 3.6× 30 518
Leslye Long Australia 11 260 1.0× 44 0.6× 34 0.6× 82 1.9× 19 0.5× 28 408
Robert L. Anders United States 12 199 0.8× 62 0.8× 114 2.1× 41 0.9× 46 1.1× 54 402
Soraya Maria de Medeiros Brazil 12 263 1.1× 91 1.2× 51 0.9× 46 1.0× 32 0.8× 109 548
Jeanette Ives Erickson United States 13 334 1.3× 85 1.1× 36 0.7× 76 1.7× 75 1.8× 43 513

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Underwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Underwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Underwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Underwood. The network helps show where Jane Underwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Underwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Underwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Underwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Underwood. Jane Underwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Valaitis, Ruta, Ruth Schofield, Noori Akhtar‐Danesh, et al.. (2014). Community health nurses’ learning needs in relation to the Canadian community health nursing standards of practice: results from a Canadian survey. BMC Nursing. 13(1). 31–31. 18 indexed citations
2.
Ganann, Rebecca, et al.. (2010). Leadership Attributes: A Key to Optimal Utilization of the Community Health Nursing Workforce. Nursing leadership. 23(2). 60–71. 7 indexed citations
3.
Meagher‐Stewart, Donna, Jane Underwood, Jennifer Blythe, et al.. (2010). Special Features: Health Policy: Organizational Attributes That Assure Optimal Utilization of Public Health Nurses. Public Health Nursing. 27(5). 433–441. 24 indexed citations
4.
Underwood, Jane, Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay, Mary Crea‐Arsenio, et al.. (2010). Appreciative inquiry: a strength-based research approach to building Canadian public health nursing capacity. Journal of research in nursing. 17(5). 484–494. 17 indexed citations
5.
Akhtar‐Danesh, Noori, Ruta Valaitis, Ruth Schofield, et al.. (2010). A Questionnaire for Assessing Community Health Nurses’ Learning Needs. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 32(8). 1055–1072. 17 indexed citations
6.
Underwood, Jane, David L. Mowat, Donna Meagher‐Stewart, et al.. (2009). Renforcement de la capacité en soins infirmiers de santé communautaire et de santé publique: Rapport de synthèse de la National Community Health Nursing Study. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 100(5). II1–II13. 26 indexed citations
7.
Baumann, Andrea, Jennifer Blythe, & Jane Underwood. (2006). Surge Capacity and Casualization. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 97(3). 230–232. 31 indexed citations
8.
Ciliska, Donna, et al.. (2001). The effectiveness of home visiting as a delivery strategy for public health nursing interventions to clients in the prenatal and postnatal period. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ciliska, Donna, et al.. (2001). The effectiveness of home visiting as a delivery strategy for public health nursing interventions to clients in the prenatal and postnatal period: a systematic review. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2(1). 41–54. 38 indexed citations
10.
Ciliska, Donna, et al.. (1999). Transferring public-health nursing research to health-system planning: assessing the relevance and accessibility of systematic reviews.. PubMed. 31(1). 23–36. 44 indexed citations
11.
Byrne, Carolyn, Gina Browne, Jacqueline Roberts, et al.. (1998). Surviving social assistance: 12-month prevalence of depression in sole-support parents receiving social assistance.. PubMed. 158(7). 881–8. 29 indexed citations
12.
Gold, Michael S., et al.. (1997). Randomized trials of public health interventions reported in the Canadian Journal of Public Health: 1966 to 1996.. PubMed. 87(6). 411–2. 1 indexed citations
13.
Ciliska, Donna, et al.. (1996). Changing nursing practice--trisectoral collaboration in decision making.. PubMed. 9(2). 60–73. 7 indexed citations
14.
Dobbins, Maureen, et al.. (1996). The effectiveness of community-based heart health projects: a systematic overview. 11 indexed citations
15.
Ciliska, Donna, et al.. (1996). A systematic overview of the effectiveness of home visiting as a delivery strategy for public health nursing interventions.. PubMed. 87(3). 193–8. 41 indexed citations
16.
Underwood, Jane, et al.. (1994). 1992 Ontario Survey of Public Health Nurses: perceptions of roles and activities.. PubMed. 85(3). 175–9. 14 indexed citations
17.
Isaacs, S, et al.. (1994). Public health nurses' quality of worklife: responses to organizational changes.. PubMed. 85(3). 185–7. 9 indexed citations
18.
Mitchell, Alba, Donna Ciliska, Andrea Baumann, et al.. (1993). Comparison of Liaison and Staff Nurses in Discharge Referrals Of Postpartum Patients for Public Health Nursing Follow-Up. Nursing Research. 42(4). 245???249–245???249. 4 indexed citations
19.
Edwards, Nancy E., et al.. (1991). The Delphi Approach to Strategic Planning. Nursing Management. 22(4). 55–57. 16 indexed citations
20.
Pickard, Laura, et al.. (1989). Hospital liaison public health nurses in Ontario: a cross-sectional survey.. PubMed. 80(4). 299–300. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026