Ruth Ohlsen

38 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

Ruth Ohlsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 439
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 177
  • Philosophy 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
Replace Richard Cosway with:
Richard Cosway United Kingdom
Emilio Rojo Spain
Franck Baylé France
Masahito Tomotake Japan
Lewis A. Opler United States
Daniel Bergé Spain
Robert Faull United States
F.-J. Baylé France
Carissa Coulston Australia
Daniel Guinart United States
Ruth Ohlsen relative to Richard Cosway United Kingdom Richard Cosway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Richard Cosway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Ohlsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Ohlsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Ohlsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Ohlsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Ohlsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Ohlsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Ohlsen. The network helps show where Ruth Ohlsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Ohlsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Ohlsen Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Ohlsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015108
2 200569
3 200060
4 200459
5 200558
6 200850
7 201235
8 201633
9 200433
10 200631
11 201724
12 200822
13 200721
14 200421
15 200412
16 201010
17 20138
18 20108
19
Antipsychotic induced weight gain: Gender differences in response to intervention
20026
20 20116

About Ruth Ohlsen

Ruth Ohlsen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Physiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (25 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (439 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations), Philosophy (97 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations). Ruth Ohlsen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lyn S. Pilowsky, Anthony S. David, Gildas Brébion, Shubuladè Smith, Georgina Peacock, Hugh Jones, Rodrigo A. Bressan, James Walters, Fiona Gaughran and S. Gacinovic. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Medicine, European Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact