Daniel Bergé

1.6k citations
67 papers · 920 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bergé

61 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Daniel Bergé
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 534
  • Biological Psychiatry 49
  • Philosophy 145
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 253
  • Clinical Psychology 247
Replace Igor Bombín with:
Igor Bombín Spain
Maria Elena Cinti Italy
Berna Binnur Akdede Türkiye
Emilio Rojo Spain
Amanda McCleery United States
Rebecca Schennach Germany
Richard Cosway United Kingdom
Ching‐Jui Chang Taiwan
James Gilleen United Kingdom
Dimitrios Kontis Greece
Daniel Bergé relative to Igor Bombín Spain Igor Bombín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Igor Bombín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bergé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bergé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bergé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bergé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bergé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bergé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bergé. The network helps show where Daniel Bergé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bergé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bergé Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bergé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201084
2 200875
3 201571
4 200956
5 201448
6 201846
7 201543
8 201832
9 202030
10 201826
11 200625
12 201723
13 200723
14 201718
15 201317
16 201517
17 202117
18 202015
19 201815
20 202015

About Daniel Bergé

Daniel Bergé is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 920 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (43 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (17 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (16 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (534 citations), Biological Psychiatry (49 citations), Philosophy (145 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (253 citations) and Clinical Psychology (247 citations). Daniel Bergé has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Víctor Pérez, Antoni Bulbena, Anna Mané, Óscar Vilarroya, P. Salgado, Susanna Carmona, Mariana Rovira, Miquel Bernardo, Emilio Fernández-Egea and Alba Toll. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, European Psychiatry and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact