Ruth Horry

853 total citations
34 papers, 530 citations indexed

About

Ruth Horry is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Horry has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 530 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth Horry's work include Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers). Ruth Horry is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers). Ruth Horry collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Ruth Horry's co-authors include Neil Brewer, Daniel B. Wright, Matthew A. Palmer, Elin M. Skagerberg, Rebecca Milne, R. Lyle Skains, Siegfried L. Sporer, Jennifer A. Rudd, Winnee Cheong and Amina Memon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Horry

33 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Horry United Kingdom 15 377 207 125 97 50 34 530
Dario Bombari Switzerland 11 222 0.6× 139 0.7× 168 1.3× 99 1.0× 48 1.0× 13 531
Robert Gaschler Germany 14 163 0.4× 95 0.5× 106 0.8× 107 1.1× 31 0.6× 68 528
Annelies Vredeveldt Netherlands 14 368 1.0× 274 1.3× 89 0.7× 89 0.9× 31 0.6× 43 521
Jun Yin China 13 392 1.0× 213 1.0× 109 0.9× 58 0.6× 19 0.4× 68 624
Erin M. Harley United States 11 344 0.9× 88 0.4× 90 0.7× 61 0.6× 57 1.1× 21 549
Miko M. Wilford United States 12 210 0.6× 205 1.0× 75 0.6× 127 1.3× 16 0.3× 29 419
Melanie Sauerland Netherlands 16 610 1.6× 449 2.2× 113 0.9× 83 0.9× 50 1.0× 87 741
Peter N. Shapiro United States 7 405 1.1× 300 1.4× 135 1.1× 215 2.2× 110 2.2× 8 620
Justin Kantner United States 11 307 0.8× 110 0.5× 100 0.8× 104 1.1× 62 1.2× 31 471
Steve D. Charman United States 13 357 0.9× 301 1.5× 45 0.4× 59 0.6× 45 0.9× 29 449

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Horry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Horry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Horry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Horry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Horry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Horry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Horry. The network helps show where Ruth Horry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Horry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Horry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Horry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Horry. Ruth Horry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Horry, Ruth, et al.. (2024). What’s the use of being nice? Characteristics of feedback comments that students intend to use in improving their work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(2). 187–198.
2.
Horry, Ruth, et al.. (2023). Development and Validation of the Climate Capability Scale. Sustainability. 15(15). 11933–11933. 5 indexed citations
3.
Rudd, Jennifer A., et al.. (2023). Climate change education through the You and CO 2 programme: modelling student engagement and teacher delivery during COVID-19. Environmental Education Research. 29(12). 1849–1869. 2 indexed citations
4.
Skains, R. Lyle, et al.. (2022). Playing for Change: Teens’ Attitudes Towards Climate Change Action as Expressed Through Interactive Digital Narrative Play. Frontiers in Communication. 6. 8 indexed citations
5.
Rudd, Jennifer A., et al.. (2021). How Big Is My Carbon Footprint? Understanding Young People’s Engagement with Climate Change Education. Sustainability. 13(4). 1961–1961. 16 indexed citations
6.
Pownall, Madeleine, Flávio Azevedo, Alaa Aldoh, et al.. (2021). Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: A bank of lesson plans and resources.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 10(3). 342–349. 11 indexed citations
7.
Skains, R. Lyle, et al.. (2021). Using Interactive Digital Narrative in Science and Health Education. 3 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Claire, et al.. (2020). Measuring misconceptions about traumatic brain injury: are existing scales misconceived?. Brain Injury. 34(9). 1150–1158. 5 indexed citations
9.
Horry, Ruth, et al.. (2020). “Only your first yes will count”: The impact of prelineup instructions on sequential lineup decisions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 27(1). 170–186. 9 indexed citations
10.
Rudd, Jennifer A., Ruth Horry, & R. Lyle Skains. (2019). You and CO2: a Public Engagement Study to Engage Secondary School Students with the Issue of Climate Change. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 29(2). 230–241. 20 indexed citations
11.
Tree, Jeremy J., Ruth Horry, Howard Riley, & Jeremy Wilmer. (2017). Are portrait artists superior face recognizers? Limited impact of adult experience on face recognition ability.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(4). 667–676. 14 indexed citations
12.
Horry, Ruth & Neil Brewer. (2016). How target–lure similarity shapes confidence judgments in multiple-alternative decision tasks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 145(12). 1615–1634. 13 indexed citations
13.
Horry, Ruth, Winnee Cheong, & Neil Brewer. (2015). The other-race effect in perception and recognition: Insights from the complete composite task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 41(2). 508–524. 35 indexed citations
14.
Horry, Ruth, Neil Brewer, & Nathan Weber. (2015). The grain-size lineup: A test of a novel eyewitness identification procedure.. Law and Human Behavior. 40(2). 147–158. 6 indexed citations
15.
Horry, Ruth, et al.. (2014). Confidence–accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues. Acta Psychologica. 151. 164–173. 18 indexed citations
16.
Palmer, Matthew A., Neil Brewer, & Ruth Horry. (2013). Understanding gender bias in face recognition: Effects of divided attention at encoding. Acta Psychologica. 142(3). 362–369. 30 indexed citations
17.
Horry, Ruth, et al.. (2013). Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: What can they tell us about eyewitness memory?. Law and Human Behavior. 38(1). 94–108. 28 indexed citations
18.
Horry, Ruth, Amina Memon, Daniel B. Wright, & Rebecca Milne. (2011). Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: A field study.. Law and Human Behavior. 36(4). 257–265. 34 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Daniel B., Ruth Horry, & Elin M. Skagerberg. (2009). Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory. Behavior Research Methods. 41(2). 257–267. 65 indexed citations
20.
Horry, Ruth & Daniel B. Wright. (2008). I know your face but not where I saw you: Context memory is impaired for other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 15(3). 610–614. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dario Bombari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Gaschler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annelies Vredeveldt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jun Yin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin M. Harley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miko M. Wilford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melanie Sauerland Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter N. Shapiro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Justin Kantner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steve D. Charman
Rankless by CCL
2026