Ruth C. May

776 total citations
20 papers, 511 citations indexed

About

Ruth C. May is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth C. May has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 511 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Strategy and Management, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth C. May's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). Ruth C. May is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). Ruth C. May collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Germany. Ruth C. May's co-authors include Wayne H. Stewart, Sheila M. Puffer, Daniel McCarthy, Arvind Kalia, Kristin L. Scott, Amy Ingram and Brent Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Business Ethics and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Ruth C. May

18 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth C. May United States	11	280	143	84	80	62	20	511
Gerhard Apfelthaler United States	9	198 0.7×	152 1.1×	81 1.0×	96 1.2×	58 0.9×	15	513
Ron Edwards Australia	9	428 1.5×	154 1.1×	140 1.7×	86 1.1×	71 1.1×	15	668
Florian Becker‐Ritterspach Germany	13	336 1.2×	176 1.2×	48 0.6×	77 1.0×	78 1.3×	34	540
József Poór Hungary	14	154 0.6×	197 1.4×	58 0.7×	73 0.9×	69 1.1×	128	682
Giuseppe Delmestri Austria	13	204 0.7×	301 2.1×	61 0.7×	75 0.9×	129 2.1×	28	544
Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito Spain	11	278 1.0×	146 1.0×	39 0.5×	63 0.8×	81 1.3×	19	549
Bih‐Shiaw Jaw Taiwan	12	307 1.1×	237 1.7×	61 0.7×	167 2.1×	76 1.2×	19	611
Víctor Oltra Spain	11	273 1.0×	263 1.8×	80 1.0×	121 1.5×	84 1.4×	27	634
Manuel Hensmans Belgium	9	177 0.6×	194 1.4×	59 0.7×	35 0.4×	125 2.0×	21	454
Soonkyoo Choe South Korea	10	293 1.0×	146 1.0×	32 0.4×	63 0.8×	116 1.9×	17	495

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth C. May

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth C. May's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth C. May with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth C. May more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth C. May

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth C. May. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth C. May. The network helps show where Ruth C. May may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth C. May

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth C. May. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth C. May based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth C. May. Ruth C. May is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Stewart, Wayne H., Ruth C. May, Kristin L. Scott, & Amy Ingram. (2021). The Ties that (Un)Bind: Change and Organizational Commitment in Ukraine. Management and Organization Review. 17(1). 77–111.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2016). Institutional Erosion and Its Effects on Russia’s Corporate Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 23(2). 191–207. 3 indexed citations

Stewart, Wayne H., et al.. (2015). Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine. Management International Review. 55(6). 737–773. 12 indexed citations

May, Ruth C. & Wayne H. Stewart. (2013). Building theory with BRICs: Russia's contribution to knowledge sharing theory. Critical Perspectives on International Business. 9(1/2). 147–172. 21 indexed citations

Smith, Brent, et al.. (2011). Real-Time Monitoring For Sustainable Fiber Reactive Dyeing Processes: Real-time analysis allows individual optimization of each shade's dyeing process and color properties. 11(5). 44. 1 indexed citations

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2011). Predictors of Individual Knowledge Acquisition Commitment in a Post-Soviet Setting. Management International Review. 51(5). 697–728. 16 indexed citations

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2010). Measuring the Environmental Impact of Online Learning: Where do we Start?. 2(2). 65–76.

Stewart, Wayne H., Ruth C. May, Daniel McCarthy, & Sheila M. Puffer. (2009). A Test of the Measurement Validity of the Resistance to Change Scale in Russia and Ukraine. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 45(4). 468–489. 19 indexed citations

Stewart, Wayne H., Ruth C. May, Daniel McCarthy, & Sheila M. Puffer. (2009). Practicing Caution in Cross-National Measurement Validation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 45(4). 494–497. 1 indexed citations

10.

Stewart, Wayne H., Ruth C. May, & Arvind Kalia. (2008). Environmental Perceptions and Scanning in the United States and India: Convergence in Entrepreneurial Information Seeking?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 32(1). 83–106. 71 indexed citations

11.

McCarthy, Daniel, et al.. (2008). Overcoming Resistance to Change in Russian Organizations:. Organizational Dynamics. 37(3). 221–235. 38 indexed citations

12.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2007). A TEST OF THE CROSS-CULTURAL EQUIVALENCY OF THE RESISTANCE TO CHANGE SCALE IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2007(1). 1–6. 5 indexed citations

13.

May, Ruth C., Sheila M. Puffer, & Daniel McCarthy. (2005). Transferring management knowledge to Russia: A culturally based approach. Academy of Management Perspectives. 19(2). 24–35. 76 indexed citations

14.

May, Ruth C.. (2003). Planned city Stalinstadt: a manifesto of the early German Democratic Republic. Planning Perspectives. 18(1). 47–78. 5 indexed citations

15.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2000). Environmental Scanning Behavior in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from Russia. Academy of Management Journal. 43(3). 403–427. 25 indexed citations

16.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (2000). ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING BEHAVIOR IN A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE FROM RUSSIA.. Academy of Management Journal. 43(3). 403–427. 146 indexed citations

17.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (1998). Lessons from Russian human resource management experience. European Management Journal. 16(4). 447–459. 51 indexed citations

18.

Stewart, Wayne H., et al.. (1996). Educating business schools about safety & health is no accident. Journal of Business Ethics. 15(8). 919–926. 6 indexed citations

19.

May, Ruth C., et al.. (1993). Managerial Practices in the Former Soviet Union. Multinational Business Review. 1(2). 66. 10 indexed citations

20.

May, Ruth C.. (1978). Marine food production: problems and prospects for Latin America.. PubMed. 26(1). 167–89. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact