This map shows the geographic impact of Russell Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell Kirk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Russell Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Russell Kirk. The network helps show where Russell Kirk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Russell Kirk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Russell Kirk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Russell Kirk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Russell Kirk. Russell Kirk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kirk, Russell. (2021). The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot. Medical Entomology and Zoology.17 indexed citations
Kirk, Russell, et al.. (1979). A Better Guide Than Reason: Federalists and Anti-federalists. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, Russell. (1978). John Randolph of Roanoke: A study in American politics, with selected speeches and letters. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
10.
Kirk, Russell. (1976). Chesterton and T. S. Eliot. The Chesterton Review. 2(2). 184–196.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.