Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Donald Davidson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Davidson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Davidson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Davidson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Davidson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Davidson. The network helps show where Donald Davidson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald Davidson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald Davidson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald Davidson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald Davidson. Donald Davidson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davidson, Donald. (2007). Widzieć poprzez język. Teksty Drugie. 128–141.
2.
Davidson, Donald & Joachim Schulte. (2006). Probleme der Rationalität. Suhrkamp eBooks.1 indexed citations
3.
Davidson, Donald, Richard Rorty, & Mike Sandbothe. (2005). Wozu Wahrheit? : eine Debatte. Suhrkamp eBooks.4 indexed citations
4.
Davidson, Donald, et al.. (1993). Enquêtes sur la vérité et l'interprétation. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).2 indexed citations
5.
Davidson, Donald & Hans Friedrich Fulda. (1993). Dialektik und Dialog. Suhrkamp eBooks.2 indexed citations
6.
Davidson, Donald & Joachim Schulte. (1993). Der Mythos des Subjektiven : philosophische essays.4 indexed citations
7.
Davidson, Donald & Pascal Engel. (1993). Actions et événements. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).9 indexed citations
8.
Davidson, Donald. (1992). The Second Person. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 17. 255–267.85 indexed citations
Davidson, Donald. (1985). Handlung und Ereignis. Suhrkamp eBooks.6 indexed citations
15.
Davidson, Donald. (1981). Las paradojas de la irracionalidad. 1(2).1 indexed citations
16.
Davidson, Donald & Gilbert Harman. (1975). The logic of grammar. Americanae (AECID Library).88 indexed citations
17.
Hempel, Carl G., Donald Davidson, & Nicholas Rescher. (1969). Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel : a tribute on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday.13 indexed citations
18.
Anderson, Alan Ross, Donald Davidson, Nicholas Rescher, Herbert A. Simon, & Georg Henrik von Wright. (1967). The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks.276 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Davidson, Donald. (1955). Twenty lessons in reading and writing prose.
20.
Ransom, John Crowe, et al.. (1951). I'll take my stand : the South and the agrarian tradition.69 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.