Ruby Grant
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 28
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 9
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 6
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 3
- Co-authors
- Meredith Nash (11 shared papers)Andrew Gorman‐Murray (1 shared paper)Kim Beasy (3 shared papers)Tania Winzenberg (2 shared papers)Sherridan Emery (2 shared papers)Emily Hansen (1 shared paper)Millicent C. Goldschmidt (1 shared paper)Daniel Y.C. Fung (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ruby Grant
37 papers receiving 321 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Gender Studies 127
- Social Psychology 156
- Clinical Psychology 68
- Reproductive Medicine 23
- Sociology and Political Science 97
Countries citing papers authored by Ruby Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruby Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruby Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruby Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruby Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruby Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruby Grant. The network helps show where Ruby Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruby Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 7 |
About Ruby Grant
Ruby Grant is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 46 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (28 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (13 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (127 citations), Social Psychology (156 citations), Clinical Psychology (68 citations), Reproductive Medicine (23 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (97 citations). Ruby Grant has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Meredith Nash, Andrew Gorman‐Murray, Kim Beasy, Tania Winzenberg, Sherridan Emery, Emily Hansen, Millicent C. Goldschmidt, Daniel Y.C. Fung, Jennifer S. White and Natalie Amos. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Transgender Health, Journal of sociology, Australian Geographer, Sex Education and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.