Meredith Nash

1.6k total citations
62 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Meredith Nash is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith Nash has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Gender Studies, 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 20 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Meredith Nash's work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (8 papers). Meredith Nash is often cited by papers focused on Gender Roles and Identity Studies (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (8 papers). Meredith Nash collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Meredith Nash's co-authors include Brendan Churchill, Ruby Grant, Linda Murray, Melanie J. Sharman, Verity Cleland, Megan Warin, Matt A. King, Mary‐Anne Lea, Narissa Bax and Justine D. Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Qualitative Health Research and Journal of Health Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Meredith Nash

62 papers receiving 997 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Meredith Nash Australia 19 435 347 226 162 135 62 1.0k
Amanda LeCouteur Australia 19 330 0.8× 151 0.4× 198 0.9× 179 1.1× 85 0.6× 58 1.1k
Sylvia D. Hoffert United States 7 491 1.1× 314 0.9× 77 0.3× 237 1.5× 217 1.6× 36 1.6k
Leith Mullings United States 18 707 1.6× 150 0.4× 120 0.5× 215 1.3× 132 1.0× 37 1.3k
Claudia Geist United States 17 707 1.6× 431 1.2× 133 0.6× 92 0.6× 135 1.0× 45 1.1k
Fiona Cram New Zealand 21 374 0.9× 217 0.6× 125 0.6× 309 1.9× 133 1.0× 85 1.4k
Rosalind Pollack Petchesky United States 14 563 1.3× 432 1.2× 105 0.5× 125 0.8× 228 1.7× 33 1.4k
Anne Woollett United Kingdom 15 325 0.7× 185 0.5× 99 0.4× 227 1.4× 171 1.3× 42 901
Laura Purdy United Kingdom 18 319 0.7× 182 0.5× 144 0.6× 125 0.8× 268 2.0× 59 1.3k
Elizabeth Ettorre United Kingdom 17 361 0.8× 150 0.4× 98 0.4× 147 0.9× 71 0.5× 49 889
Glenda Wall Canada 12 578 1.3× 315 0.9× 122 0.5× 189 1.2× 101 0.7× 15 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Nash. The network helps show where Meredith Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith Nash. Meredith Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Leane, Elizabeth, et al.. (2023). “The Only Almost Germ-Free Continent Left”. Environmental Humanities. 15(1). 109–127. 4 indexed citations
2.
Liggett, Daniela, Andrea Herbert, Renuka Badhe, et al.. (2023). Researchers on ice? How the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Antarctic researchers. Antarctic Science. 35(2). 141–160. 3 indexed citations
3.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2023). Towards intersectional approaches to gendered change in Antarctic research. Antarctic Science. 35(5). 390–402. 6 indexed citations
4.
Armour, Mike, Dani Barrington, Helen Connolly, et al.. (2023). Menstrual Justice: A Human Rights Vision for Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Sharman, Melanie J., et al.. (2023). The importance of family support to engage and retain girls in male dominated action sports. A qualitative study of young people's perspectives. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 35(2). 410–422. 2 indexed citations
6.
Nash, Meredith, Elizabeth Leane, & Kimberley Norris. (2022). It’s just that uncertainty that eats away at people: Antarctic expeditioners’ lived experiences of COVID-19. PLoS ONE. 17(11). e0277676–e0277676. 3 indexed citations
7.
Nash, Meredith. (2022). Who should work in Antarctica? An exploration of the individual, social and cultural aspects of expeditioner recruitment. Antarctic Science. 34(6). 432–445. 6 indexed citations
8.
Nash, Meredith. (2022). Breaking the silence around blood: managing menstruation during remote Antarctic fieldwork. Gender Place & Culture. 30(8). 1083–1103. 6 indexed citations
9.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2021). Women’s experiences of racial microaggressions in STEMM workplaces and the importance of white allyship. UTAS Research Repository. 13(1). 3–22. 8 indexed citations
10.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2021). Male allyship in institutional STEMM gender equity initiatives. PLoS ONE. 16(3). e0248373–e0248373. 16 indexed citations
11.
Grant, Ruby, et al.. (2021). Health practitioner and student attitudes to caring for transgender patients in Tasmania: An exploratory qualitative study. Australian Journal of General Practice. 50(6). 416–421. 7 indexed citations
12.
Nash, Meredith & Brendan Churchill. (2020). Caring during COVID‐19: A gendered analysis of Australian university responses to managing remote working and caring responsibilities. Gender Work and Organization. 27(5). 833–846. 142 indexed citations
13.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2019). “Antarctica just has this hero factor…”: Gendered barriers to Australian Antarctic research and remote fieldwork. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0209983–e0209983. 46 indexed citations
14.
Nash, Meredith. (2018). From ‘Tramp Stamps’ to Traditional Sleeves: A Feminist Autobiographical Account of Tattoos. Australian Feminist Studies. 33(97). 362–383. 2 indexed citations
15.
Sharman, Melanie J., Meredith Nash, & Verity Cleland. (2018). Health and broader community benefit of parkrun—An exploratory qualitative study. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 30(2). 163–171. 24 indexed citations
16.
Nash, Meredith & Imelda Whelehan. (2017). Reading Lena Dunham's Girls feminism, postfeminism, authenticity and gendered performance in contemporary television. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 6 indexed citations
17.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2017). Brain death during pregnancy and prolonged corporeal support of the body: A critical discussion. Women and Birth. 30(5). 354–360. 8 indexed citations
18.
Nash, Meredith, et al.. (2017). What style of leadership do women in STEMM fields perform? Findings from an international survey. PLoS ONE. 12(10). e0185727–e0185727. 18 indexed citations
19.
Nash, Meredith. (2016). White pregnant bodies on the Australian beach: a visual discourse analysis of family photographs. Journal of Gender Studies. 27(5). 589–606. 2 indexed citations
20.
Nash, Meredith. (2014). Picturing mothers: A photovoice study of body image in pregnancy. Health Sociology Review. 4141–4168. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amanda LeCouteur Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sylvia D. Hoffert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leith Mullings Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Claudia Geist Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona Cram Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rosalind Pollack Petchesky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Woollett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Purdy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Ettorre Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glenda Wall
Rankless by CCL
2026