Roy Porter
Impact in
- Drug Discovery top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Papers in
- Biochemistry 12
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 12
- Food Science 15
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 13
- Co-authors
- Petrea FaceyLawrence A. D. WilliamsPaul B. ReeseB. J. HawkinsKeith O. PascoeDavid J. WilliamsAmusa S. AdebayoDeon A. Bennett
- Journals
- Natural Product Communications (6 papers)Journal of Chromatographic Science (2 papers)Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Phytochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JamaicaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roy Porter
32 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Drug Discovery 4
- Food Science 144
- Pharmacology 69
- Plant Science 237
- Biochemistry 37
Countries citing papers authored by Roy Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of Roy Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roy Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy Porter. The network helps show where Roy Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roy Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 50 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 41 |
About Roy Porter
Roy Porter is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Food Science, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (12 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (3 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Drug Discovery (4 citations), Food Science (144 citations), Pharmacology (69 citations), Plant Science (237 citations) and Biochemistry (37 citations). Roy Porter has collaborated with scholars based in Jamaica, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Petrea Facey, Lawrence A. D. Williams, Paul B. Reese, B. J. Hawkins, Keith O. Pascoe, David J. Williams, Amusa S. Adebayo, Deon A. Bennett, Rupika Delgoda and Winklet A. Gallimore. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Product Communications, Journal of Chromatographic Science, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Scientific Reports and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.