Natural Product Communications

6.0k papers and 52.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in Natural Product Communications in the last decades have received a total of 52.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Product Communications usually cover Molecular Biology (2.9k papers), Plant Science (2.5k papers) and Food Science (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (1.4k papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1.3k papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Product Communications are William N. Setzer, Andrea Barra, Tsukasa Iwashina, Michaël Wink, Solomon Habtemariam, Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Alvaro Viljoen, Chen‐Lung Ho, Rajesh K. Joshi and Ali Shafaghat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Product Communications

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Product Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Product Communications.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Product Communications

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Product Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Product Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Product Communications more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025