Rotem Leshem

593 citations
28 papers · 410 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Rotem Leshem

26 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Rotem Leshem
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Clinical Psychology 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 133
Replace Kevin Meares with:
Kevin Meares United Kingdom
Kaitlyn Breiner United States
Sarah M. Tashjian United States
Danielle V. Dellarco United States
Shannon J. Peake United States
Mara van der Meulen Netherlands
Felicia Jackson United States
Nicole M. Strang United States
Chris J. Burgin United States
Amanda Kesek United States
Rotem Leshem relative to Kevin Meares United Kingdom Kevin Meares's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kevin Meares · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rotem Leshem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rotem Leshem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rotem Leshem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rotem Leshem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rotem Leshem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rotem Leshem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rotem Leshem. The network helps show where Rotem Leshem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Rotem Leshem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rotem Leshem Line = papers co-authored together Rotem Leshem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200782
2 201927
3 200527
4 201626
5 202026
6 201625
7 201921
8 202020
9 201920
10 201519
11 202219
12 200618
13 202013
14 201212
15 20208
16 20198
17 20187
18 20226
19 20225
20 20135

About Rotem Leshem

Rotem Leshem is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (60 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations), Clinical Psychology (144 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (133 citations). Rotem Leshem has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Glicksohn, Tal Dotan Ben‐Soussan, Boaz M. Ben‐David, Sarah Ben‐David, Pascal van Lieshout, Michele Pellegrino, Michal Icht, Anat Kasirer, Nira Mashal and David Weisburd. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Developmental Neuropsychology, Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers in Psychiatry and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact