Rosa Freedman
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Gender Studies
- History top 10%
- Development top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nicolas Lemay‐HébertEric HeinzeRuth HoughtonDavid HirshGuy E. SwansonHorace MinerAmos H. HawleySister Mary Edward Healy
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (16 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (13 papers)Human Rights and Development (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIran
In The Last Decade
Rosa Freedman
27 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Sociology and Political Science 106
- Political Science and International Relations 85
- Gender Studies 30
- History 22
- Development 14
Countries citing papers authored by Rosa Freedman
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosa Freedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosa Freedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosa Freedman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosa Freedman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosa Freedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosa Freedman. The network helps show where Rosa Freedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosa Freedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosa Freedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosa Freedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosa Freedman. Rosa Freedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Towards an alternative interpretation of U.N. immunity:a human rights-based approach to the Haiti cholera Case | 1 |
| 11 | Failing to Protect: The UN and the Politicisation of Human Rights | 2 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | The UN Human Rights Council: a critique and early assessment | 3 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | The United Nations Human Rights Council: More of the same? | 4 |
| 17 | Public Awareness of Human Rights: Distortions in the Mass Media | 1 |
| 18 | Improvement on the Commission?: The UN Human Rights Council’s Inaction on Darfur | 3 |
| 19 | The United States and the U.N. Human Rights Council: An Early Assessment | 1 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Rosa Freedman
Rosa Freedman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 31 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (16 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (13 papers) and Human Rights and Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (14 citations), Political Science and International Relations (85 citations) and Gender Studies (30 citations). Rosa Freedman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Lemay‐Hébert, Eric Heinze, Ruth Houghton, David Hirsh, Guy E. Swanson, Horace Miner, Amos H. Hawley, Sister Mary Edward Healy and Sarah‐Jayne Blakemore. Their work appears in journals such as Human Rights Quarterly, Development in Practice and European Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.