Guglielmo Verdirame
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- History top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (15 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (12 papers)Human Rights and Development (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Guglielmo Verdirame
21 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Sociology and Political Science 143
- Political Science and International Relations 113
- Clinical Psychology 28
- History 25
- Strategy and Management 12
Countries citing papers authored by Guglielmo Verdirame
This map shows the geographic impact of Guglielmo Verdirame's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guglielmo Verdirame with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guglielmo Verdirame more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guglielmo Verdirame
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guglielmo Verdirame. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guglielmo Verdirame. The network helps show where Guglielmo Verdirame may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guglielmo Verdirame
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guglielmo Verdirame. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guglielmo Verdirame based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guglielmo Verdirame. Guglielmo Verdirame is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Philosophy of International Law | 0 |
| 3 | Judicial Power and Military Action | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation | 3 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Human Rights in Wartime: A Framework for Analysis | 1 |
| 11 | The Michigan Guidelines on Protection Elsewhere | 2 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 108 | |
| 14 | Rights in exile | 5 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | The Great Lakes: A Survey of the Application of the Exclusion Clauses in the Central African Republic, Kenya and Tanzania | 2 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | The Creation and Amendment of Constitutional Norms | 2 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Guglielmo Verdirame
Guglielmo Verdirame is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (15 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (12 papers) and Human Rights and Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (113 citations), Development (12 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (143 citations). Guglielmo Verdirame has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara E. Harrell-Bond, Richard Ekins and John Tasioulas. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Journal of Refugee Studies and Human Rights Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.