Phil Orchard
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Development top 10%
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers)International Law and Human Rights (10 papers)Migration, Refugees, and Integration (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational AffairsReview of International Studies
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Phil Orchard
30 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Political Science and International Relations 92
- Clinical Psychology 27
- Development 17
- History 16
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Orchard
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Orchard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Orchard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Orchard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Orchard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Orchard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Orchard. The network helps show where Phil Orchard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Orchard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Orchard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Orchard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Orchard. Phil Orchard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Protecting the Internally Displaced : Rhetoric and Reality | 7 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Transnational humanitarian action and regime complexity: The case of Syria | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | The normative institutionalization–implementation gap | 2 |
| 15 | Reconsidering Safe Areas as a Means to Protect Civilians | 1 |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | Review Article: The evolution of the responsibility to protect: at a crossroads? | 1 |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Phil Orchard
Phil Orchard is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and History, having authored 33 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers), International Law and Human Rights (10 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (17 citations), Political Science and International Relations (92 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (121 citations). Phil Orchard has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Hartley, Alexander Betts, Fiona McGaughey and Suzanne B. Goldberg. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Affairs and Review of International Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.