Mita Banerjee

29 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Mita Banerjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 266
  • Social Psychology 193
  • Clinical Psychology 183
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 119
Replace Manuel Sprung with:
Manuel Sprung Austria
Ina Faßbender Germany
Liat Sayfan United States
Adriano Pagnin Italy
Federica Bianco Italy
Marinella Majorano Italy
Joanne Lawson United Kingdom
Ameneh Shahaeian Australia
Nevena Dimitrova Switzerland
Beth Shepard United States
Mita Banerjee relative to Manuel Sprung Austria Manuel Sprung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Manuel Sprung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mita Banerjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mita Banerjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mita Banerjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mita Banerjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mita Banerjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mita Banerjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mita Banerjee. The network helps show where Mita Banerjee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mita Banerjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mita Banerjee Line = papers co-authored together Mita Banerjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20231
3 20222
4 20213
5 20213
6 20191
7 20191
8 20181
9 20185
10 201813
11 201672
12 20164
13 201613
14 20168
15 20138
16 20101
17 20081
18 20042
19 199777
20
Preschoolers' understanding of emotion: Appearance-reality, display rules, and regulation strategies.
19925

About Mita Banerjee

Mita Banerjee is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Pharmacy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (266 citations), Social Psychology (193 citations), Clinical Psychology (183 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (119 citations). Mita Banerjee has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry M. Wellman, Anna Sinclair, Paul L. Harris, Thomas Efferth, Norbert W. Paul, Manfred E. Beutel, Jörg Wiltink, Elmar Brähler, Karl J. Lackner and Claus Jünger. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Journal of Aging Studies, Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, International Journal of Cardiology and British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026