Ronaldo Pilati

3.9k total citations
76 papers, 759 citations indexed

About

Ronaldo Pilati is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ronaldo Pilati has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 759 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 33 papers in Social Psychology and 23 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ronaldo Pilati's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers). Ronaldo Pilati is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers). Ronaldo Pilati collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, New Zealand and Netherlands. Ronaldo Pilati's co-authors include Jairo Eduardo Borges‐Andrade, Jéssica Esther Machado Farias, Juliana Barreiros Porto, Ronald Fischer, Jacob Arie Laros, Gardênia da Silva Abbad, Maria Cristina Ferreira, Taciano L. Milfont, André Luiz Alves Rabelo and Victor N. Keller and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Ronaldo Pilati

69 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

Ronaldo Pilati

SPS

OBHRM

Emily Zitek United States

Kathrynn Pounders United States

Georgina Randsley de Moura United Kingdom

Christiane Atzmüller Austria

Maria Luisa Farnese Italy

Bella L. Galperin United States

Jörg Doll Germany

Jennifer L. Welbourne United States

Richard Hermida United States

Michael B. Hargis United States

Emily Zitek United States

Ronaldo Pilati

388 ×1.4

SPS

282 ×1.5

74 ×0.6

105 ×0.9

OBHRM

131 ×1.2

Citations per year, relative to Ronaldo Pilati Ronaldo Pilati (= 1×) peers Emily Zitek

Countries citing papers authored by Ronaldo Pilati

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ronaldo Pilati's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronaldo Pilati with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronaldo Pilati more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ronaldo Pilati

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronaldo Pilati. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronaldo Pilati. The network helps show where Ronaldo Pilati may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronaldo Pilati

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronaldo Pilati. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronaldo Pilati based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronaldo Pilati. Ronaldo Pilati is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2025). Actively Open-Minded Thinking About Evidence (AOT-E) Scale: Adaptation and Evidence of Validity in a Brazilian Sample. Judgment and Decision Making. 20. 1 indexed citations

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2025). Understanding How Moral Judgments Vary Across Cultures: Moderator Effects of Cultural Values, Social Axioms, and Tightness. Cross-Cultural Research. 59(4). 516–532.

Rabelo, André Luiz Alves, et al.. (2024). “They don't want you to know the truth”: Evaluating predictors of beliefs in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 38(1). 2 indexed citations

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2023). Adaptation of the Learned Helplessness Scale in Brazil. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 39.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2023). Differences in decisions affected by cognitive biases: examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica. 36(1). 26–26. 5 indexed citations

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2022). Does anchoring vary across cultures? Expanding the Many Labs analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology. 53(3). 585–594. 2 indexed citations

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2021). COVID-19 as infodemic : the impact of political orientation and open-mindedness on the discernment of misinformation in WhatsApp. RIUnB Institutional Repository (University of Brasília). 5 indexed citations

Farias, Jéssica Esther Machado & Ronaldo Pilati. (2021). COVID-19 as an undesirable political issue: Conspiracy beliefs and intolerance of uncertainty predict adhesion to prevention measures. Current Psychology. 42(1). 209–219. 34 indexed citations

Farias, Jéssica Esther Machado, et al.. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and tourism: The impact of health risk perception and intolerance of uncertainty on travel intentions. Current Psychology. 42(3). 2500–2513. 51 indexed citations

10.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2020). “Why are the Corrupt, Corrupt?”: The Multilevel Analytical Model of Corruption. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 23. e5–e5. 21 indexed citations

11.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2019). Between simpatia and malandragem: Brazilian jeitinho as an individual difference variable. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0214929–e0214929. 28 indexed citations

12.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2018). Racism and Affirmative Action: Evidence for the Justified Discrimination Model. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa. 33.

13.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2017). Escala Pessoal de Crenças no Mundo Justo: Adaptação e Evidências de Validade. Psico-USF. 22(1). 13–22. 6 indexed citations

14.

Rabelo, André Luiz Alves, Ronaldo Pilati, & Juliana Barreiros Porto. (2016). O Teste de Associação Implícita para avaliação da preferência profissional em psicologia. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional. 17(2). 188–199. 2 indexed citations

15.

Rabelo, André Luiz Alves, Victor N. Keller, Ronaldo Pilati, & Jelte M. Wicherts. (2015). No Effect of Weight on Judgments of Importance in the Moral Domain and Evidence of Publication Bias from a Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 10(8). e0134808–e0134808. 18 indexed citations

16.

Rabelo, André Luiz Alves, et al.. (2012). A Moderação da Prosocialidade entre o Priming e a Intenção de Gentileza. Psico. 43(2). 4. 5 indexed citations

17.

Pilati, Ronaldo & Jairo Eduardo Borges‐Andrade. (2012). Training Effectiveness: Transfer Strategies, Perception of Support and Worker Commitment as Predictors. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 28(1). 25–35. 10 indexed citations

18.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2009). Validación y Test de la Equivalencia de la Estructura Factorial de la Escala de Estrategias de Aplicación de lo Aprendido. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations

19.

Pilati, Ronaldo, et al.. (2008). Gerenciamento de impressão nas entrevistas de seleção: proposição de uma agenda de pesquisa. 8(2). 121–138. 1 indexed citations

20.

Pilati, Ronaldo & Jairo Eduardo Borges‐Andrade. (2004). Estudo empírico dos antecedentes de medidas de impacto do treinamento no trabalho. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa. 20(1). 31–38. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact