Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells.
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Klein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Klein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Klein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Klein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Klein. The network helps show where Richard Klein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Klein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Klein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Klein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Klein. Richard Klein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carter, Michelle, Ryan Wright, Jason Bennett Thatcher, & Richard Klein. (2014). Understanding Online Customers’ Ties to Merchants: The Moderating Influence of Trust on the Relationship between Switching Costs and E-Loyalty. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
7.
Klein, Richard. (2013). Franz Graf (dir.), Honegger frères. Architectes et constructeurs 1930-1969. De la production au patrimoine. Infolio, 2010. 89.1 indexed citations
8.
Klein, Richard, et al.. (2012). Richard Wagner und seine Medien : für eine kritische Praxis des Musiktheaters. Klett-Cotta eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Klein, Richard. (2011). An Analysis Of China's Human Rights Policies In Tibet: China's Compliance With The Mandates Of International Law regarding Civil And Political Rights. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 18(1). 115–165.1 indexed citations
10.
Roberts, Nicholas & Richard Klein. (2009). Increasing Process Improvement through Internet-based eBusiness Innovations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 113.
Roberts, Nicholas, Jason Bennett Thatcher, & Richard Klein. (2006). Mindfulness in the Domain of Information Systems. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 63(3). 283–90.1 indexed citations
14.
Klein, Richard. (2005). Strategic Partnerships versus Captive Buyer and Supplier Relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 31.1 indexed citations
15.
Klein, Richard. (2004). An Examination of Adoption of Electronic Supply Chain Initiatives by U.S. Medical Practices. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 32.2 indexed citations
16.
Klein, Richard. (2004). Das Subjekt in der Kur. Über die Bedingungen psychoanalytischer Psychotherapie. Psyche. 58(8). 767–771.2 indexed citations
17.
Wareham, Jonathan, Karlene Cousins, & Richard Klein. (2003). Service and commodity based electronic intermediaries: a comparative analysis.. European Conference on Information Systems. 2119–2134.1 indexed citations
18.
Klein, Richard. (1988). Die Sklaverei in der Sicht der Bischöfe Ambrosius und Augustinus. Steiner eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.