Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessment of Antioxidant Activity by Using Different In Vitro Methods
2002712 citationsVolker Böhm, Roland Bitsch et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Roland Bitsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roland Bitsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roland Bitsch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roland Bitsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roland Bitsch. The network helps show where Roland Bitsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roland Bitsch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roland Bitsch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roland Bitsch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roland Bitsch. Roland Bitsch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Patz, Claus‐Dieter, Frank Will, Helmut Dietrich, et al.. (2006). Characterization of juices of different apple cultivars. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. 102(9). 426–435.9 indexed citations
Frank, Thomas S., et al.. (2005). Urinary pharmacokinetics of cyanidin glycosides in healthy young men following consumption of elderberry juice.. PubMed. 25(2). 47–56.14 indexed citations
5.
Dietrich, Helmut, Andreas R. Rechner, Claus‐Dieter Patz, et al.. (2003). Influence of processing on the phenolic antioxidants of apple juices Einfluss der verarbeitung auf die phenolischen antioxidanzien von apfelsäften. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. 99(1). 1–11.10 indexed citations
6.
Freund, M., et al.. (2003). Einfluss der Mostvorklärung auf die sensorische Qualität von Rieslingweinen aus dem Rheingau. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 53. 166–183.2 indexed citations
7.
Roth‐Maier, D. A., Brigitte R. Paulicks, Rudolf Schubert, et al.. (2001). First results on the use of Echinacea - Cobs (Echinacea purpurea) in animal feeding.. 205–210.1 indexed citations
Kraft, Jana, J.M. Griinari, P. Möckel, et al.. (2001). Effects of CLA calcium salts on CLA content in milk lipids.. 217–222.2 indexed citations
10.
Daenicke, Reinhard, Gerhard Flachowsky, Rudolf Schubert, Gerhard Jahreis, & Roland Bitsch. (2001). Efficacy of the probiotic Toyocerin on the performance of raising calves.. 521–526.2 indexed citations
11.
Bitsch, I., M. Netzel, G. Straß, et al.. (2000). High-quality fruit juices from special apple varieties - their contribution to a healthy diet according to the 'five-a-day' campaign.. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 47(11). 428–431.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.