Roberto Di Paolo
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Co-authors
- Valerio CapraroMatjaž PercEnnio BilanciniLeonardo BoncinelliTatiana CeladinGiovanni PontiEmiliano RicciardiGian Luigi Albano
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalySpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Roberto Di Paolo
13 papers receiving 110 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Safety Research 39
- Cognitive Neuroscience 18
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
- Management Science and Operations Research 14
Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Di Paolo
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Di Paolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Di Paolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Di Paolo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Di Paolo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Di Paolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Di Paolo. The network helps show where Roberto Di Paolo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Di Paolo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Di Paolo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Di Paolo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Di Paolo. Roberto Di Paolo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligencebreakdown → | 47 |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 |
About Roberto Di Paolo
Roberto Di Paolo is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Safety Research (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (65 citations). Roberto Di Paolo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Valerio Capraro, Matjaž Perc, Ennio Bilancini, Leonardo Boncinelli, Tatiana Celadin, Giovanni Ponti, Emiliano Ricciardi, Gian Luigi Albano, Francesco Serti and Luca Businaro. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.