Robert Poole

535 citations
20 papers · 292 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Poole

19 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Robert Poole
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 128
  • Language and Linguistics 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 96
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Human-Computer Interaction 17
Replace Paul Gillaerts with:
Paul Gillaerts Belgium
Otto Kruse Switzerland
Robert L. Roseberry Brunei
Hung Phu Bui Vietnam
Safnil Arsyad Indonesia
Eddo Rigotti Switzerland
Susanmarie Harrington United States
Luxin Yang China
Didin Nuruddin Hidayat Indonesia
Arshad Abd Samad Malaysia
Robert Poole relative to Paul Gillaerts Belgium Paul Gillaerts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Paul Gillaerts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Poole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Poole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Poole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Poole. The network helps show where Robert Poole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert Poole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Poole Line = papers co-authored together Robert Poole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201946
2 202039
3 201625
4 201425
5 201624
6 202221
7 201219
8
The Incredible Machine
198619
9 201914
10 201713
11 201711
12 202110
13 20188
14 20225
15 20174
16 20223
17 20243
18
Concordance-based glosses for facilitating semantization and enhancing productive knowledge of academic vocabulary
20112
19 20251
20 20230

About Robert Poole

Robert Poole is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Linguistics and Language, having authored 20 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (11 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (128 citations), Language and Linguistics (86 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (96 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (17 citations). Robert Poole has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gus Hahn-Powell, Sydney A. Spangler, Nicholas Hayes and Laura Niemi. Their work appears in journals such as English for Specific Purposes, Critical Discourse Studies, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, International Journal of Business Communication and Russian Journal of Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact