Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution
2003792 citationsRobert Phaal, Clare Farrukh et al.profile →
A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice
2013271 citationsImoh Ilevbare, David Probert et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Phaal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Phaal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Phaal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Phaal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Phaal. The network helps show where Robert Phaal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Phaal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Phaal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Phaal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Phaal. Robert Phaal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Phaal, Robert & Clive Kerr. (2018). TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPPING. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 65(3). 524–524.2 indexed citations
4.
Bocken, Nancy, Padmakshi Rana, Nicky Athanassopoulou, Imoh Ilevbare, & Robert Phaal. (2016). A Strategy Process for Early Stage Ventures to Develop Sustainable Value Opportunities. 8(2). 183.1 indexed citations
5.
Mortara, Letizia, Robert Phaal, Clive Kerr, Clare Farrukh, & David Probert. (2014). Tool fingerprinting: Characterising management tools. Apollo (University of Cambridge).5 indexed citations
6.
Fujinami, Tsutomu, et al.. (2012). Gaps between Assistive Technologies and Dementia Care. JAIST Repository.1 indexed citations
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (2011). Exploring the impacts of the interactions between lifecycles and other dynamics that influence the development of technology-based industries. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.5 indexed citations
9.
Probert, David, et al.. (2011). Towards a process framework for assessing the potential value of technologies. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.7 indexed citations
10.
Probert, David, et al.. (2011). Understanding and communicating the value of technology: A process perspective. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
11.
Phaal, Robert, Clare Farrukh, & David Probert. (2010). Roadmapping for strategy and innovation - aligning technology and markets in a dynamic world. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.67 indexed citations
12.
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (2008). Chief technology officer (CTO) perspectives on their role and contribution. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
13.
Liu, Tao, et al.. (2008). Developing the concept of innovation readiness levels. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.3 indexed citations
14.
Mortara, Letizia, Clive Kerr, Robert Phaal, & David Probert. (2007). Technology Intelligence - Identifying threats and opportunities from new technologiesŐ. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
15.
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (2006). A framework for strategic military capabilities in defense transformation. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.11 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Russell W. & Robert Phaal. (2001). The use of technology roadmapping as a tool to manage technology developments and maximise the value of research activity. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
17.
Hunt, Frances, et al.. (2001). Technology re-use: developing a practical approach to making the most of your technological assets. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
18.
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (2001). Structuring a systematic approach to technology management: concepts and practice. 38(5). 220–8.11 indexed citations
19.
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (2000). Technology management: integrating technology into business planning. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
20.
Phaal, Robert, et al.. (1998). Technology management process assessment: implementation factors. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.