Robert P. Stoker
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Michael J. RichHarold WolmanEric LawrenceClarence N. StoneJohn J. BetancurKaren MossbergerJuliet MussoSusan E. Clarke
- Topics
- Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers)Policy Transfer and Learning (4 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert P. Stoker
18 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Sociology and Political Science 110
- Political Science and International Relations 89
- Public Administration 82
- Economics and Econometrics 55
- Strategy and Management 51
Countries citing papers authored by Robert P. Stoker
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert P. Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert P. Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert P. Stoker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert P. Stoker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert P. Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert P. Stoker. The network helps show where Robert P. Stoker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert P. Stoker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert P. Stoker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert P. Stoker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert P. Stoker. Robert P. Stoker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Neighborhood Inequality and Revitalization: An Exploration of Five Themes through the Baltimore Case | 1 |
| 13 | When work is not enough | 1 |
| 14 | When Work Is Not Enough: State and Federal Policies to Support Needy Workers | 6 |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | Welfare bureaus as moral tutors : What do clients learn from paternalistic welfare reforms ? | 11 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Robert P. Stoker
Robert P. Stoker is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (82 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (89 citations). Robert P. Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Rich, Harold Wolman, Eric Lawrence, Clarence N. Stone, John J. Betancur, Karen Mossberger, Juliet Musso, Susan E. Clarke, Martin Horák and Jefferey M. Sellers. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Perspectives on Politics and Social Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.