Robert P. Stoker
- Public Administration top 5%
- Public Policy and Administration Research 5
- Urban Studies top 10%
-
- Policy Transfer and Learning 4
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- Local Government Finance and Decentralization 3
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 2
- Finance top 10%
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 3
-
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 2
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 2
Robert P. Stoker
18 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Public Administration 82
- Urban Studies 30
- Political Science and International Relations 89
- Finance 38
- Strategy and Management 51
Countries citing papers authored by Robert P. Stoker
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert P. Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert P. Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert P. Stoker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert P. Stoker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert P. Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert P. Stoker. The network helps show where Robert P. Stoker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Robert P. Stoker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 12 | Neighborhood Inequality and Revitalization: An Exploration of Five Themes through the Baltimore Case | 2008 | 1 |
| 13 | When work is not enough | 2006 | 1 |
| 14 | When Work Is Not Enough: State and Federal Policies to Support Needy Workers | 2005 | 6 |
| 15 | 2004 | 97 | |
| 16 | Welfare bureaus as moral tutors : What do clients learn from paternalistic welfare reforms ? | 1999 | 11 |
| 17 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 1 |
About Robert P. Stoker
Robert P. Stoker is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (3 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (82 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (89 citations). Robert P. Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Rich, Harold Wolman, Eric Lawrence, Clarence N. Stone, John J. Betancur, Karen Mossberger, Juliet Musso, Susan E. Clarke, Martin Horák and Jefferey M. Sellers. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Perspectives on Politics and Social Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.