Robert Merrihew Adams
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Co-authors
- Immanuel KantWilliam E. MannJ. L. MackieGeorge di GiovanniAllen W. WoodCharles HartshorneDonald RutherfordMarilyn McCord Adams
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (17 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers)War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaHungary
In The Last Decade
Robert Merrihew Adams
70 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Philosophy 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 604
- Cognitive Neuroscience 470
- History and Philosophy of Science 317
- Political Science and International Relations 244
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Merrihew Adams
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Merrihew Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Merrihew Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Merrihew Adams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Merrihew Adams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Merrihew Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Merrihew Adams. The network helps show where Robert Merrihew Adams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Merrihew Adams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Merrihew Adams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Merrihew Adams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Merrihew Adams. Robert Merrihew Adams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again | 14 |
| 3 | Über Sünde, Glaube und Religion | 0 |
| 4 | 106 | |
| 5 | 145 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil | 78 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Robert Merrihew Adams
Robert Merrihew Adams is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Religious studies, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (17 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.3k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (317 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (604 citations). Robert Merrihew Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Immanuel Kant, William E. Mann, J. L. Mackie, George di Giovanni, Allen W. Wood, Charles Hartshorne, Donald Rutherford, Marilyn McCord Adams, Robert Markley and Nicholas Jolley. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, American Psychologist and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.