Dwight W. Curtis

1.2k total citations
26 papers, 860 citations indexed

About

Dwight W. Curtis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dwight W. Curtis has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 860 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dwight W. Curtis's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers). Dwight W. Curtis is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers). Dwight W. Curtis collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Dwight W. Curtis's co-authors include Stanley J. Rule, Thomas L. Harrington, Robert Markley, Harry T. Lawless and David A. Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Acta Psychologica.

In The Last Decade

Dwight W. Curtis

26 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

Dwight W. Curtis

CN

ECP

SP

FS

SP

Stanley J. Rule Canada

Miguelina Guirao Argentina

Tarow Indow Japan

Robert A. M. Gregson New Zealand

David H. Raab United States

Hans-Georg Geißler Germany

Sergio Cesare Masin Italy

Goesta Ekman Sweden

Peter A. van der Helm Netherlands

R. A. Kinchla United States

Stanley J. Rule Canada

Dwight W. Curtis

461 ×1.0

CN

258 ×1.0

ECP

203 ×1.1

SP

99 ×0.8

FS

102 ×0.9

SP

Citations per year, relative to Dwight W. Curtis Dwight W. Curtis (= 1×) peers Stanley J. Rule

Countries citing papers authored by Dwight W. Curtis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dwight W. Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dwight W. Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dwight W. Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dwight W. Curtis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dwight W. Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dwight W. Curtis. The network helps show where Dwight W. Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dwight W. Curtis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dwight W. Curtis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dwight W. Curtis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dwight W. Curtis. Dwight W. Curtis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1985). Ordinal properties of perceived average duration: Simultaneous and sequential presentations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 11(4). 509–516. 8 indexed citations

2.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1985). Ordinal properties of perceived average duration: Simultaneous and sequential presentations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 11(4). 509–516. 7 indexed citations

3.

Rule, Stanley J., et al.. (1983). Composition rule for perceived duration of simultaneous events. Perception & Psychophysics. 34(6). 569–572. 4 indexed citations

4.

Rule, Stanley J., et al.. (1981). Subjective ratios and differences in perceived heaviness.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 7(2). 459–466. 28 indexed citations

5.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1980). Ordinal properties of subjective ratios and differences: Comment on Veit.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 109(3). 296–300. 5 indexed citations

6.

Curtis, Dwight W. & Stanley J. Rule. (1980). Fechner’s paradox reflects a nonmonotone relation between binocular brightness and luminance. Perception & Psychophysics. 27(3). 263–266. 29 indexed citations

7.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1980). Ordinal properties of subjective ratios and differences: Comment on Veit.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 109(3). 296–300. 11 indexed citations

8.

Curtis, Dwight W. & Stanley J. Rule. (1978). Binocular processing of brightness information: A vector-sum model.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 4(1). 132–143. 62 indexed citations

9.

Curtis, Dwight W. & Stanley J. Rule. (1977). Judgment of duration relations: Simultaneous and sequential presentation. Perception & Psychophysics. 22(6). 578–584. 48 indexed citations

10.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1977). Subject differences in input and output transformations from magnitude estimation of differences. Acta Psychologica. 41(1). 61–65. 36 indexed citations

11.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1976). Converging power functions as a description of the size-weight illusion: A control experiment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 8(1). 16–18. 4 indexed citations

12.

Curtis, Dwight W., et al.. (1975). Judgments of average magnitude: Analyses in terms of the functional measurement and two-stage models. Perception & Psychophysics. 18(4). 299–308. 39 indexed citations

13.

Rule, Stanley J., et al.. (1974). Magnitude judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness: A two-stage analysis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 103(6). 1108–1114. 58 indexed citations

14.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1973). Reevaluation of two models for judgments of perceptual intervals. Perception & Psychophysics. 14(3). 433–436. 39 indexed citations

15.

Curtis, Dwight W., et al.. (1973). Relation between disjunctive reaction time and stimulus difference.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 99(2). 167–173. 24 indexed citations

16.

Rule, Stanley J. & Dwight W. Curtis. (1973). Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 97(3). 305–309. 54 indexed citations

17.

Curtis, Dwight W. & Stanley J. Rule. (1972). Magnitude judgments of brightness and brightness difference as a function of background reflectance.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 95(1). 215–222. 15 indexed citations

18.

Rule, Stanley J., Dwight W. Curtis, & Robert Markley. (1970). Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 86(3). 343–349. 74 indexed citations

19.

Curtis, Dwight W., et al.. (1969). Direct quantitative judgments of sums and a two-stage model for psychophysical judgments. Perception & Psychophysics. 5(2). 89–93. 29 indexed citations

20.

Curtis, Dwight W., et al.. (1968). A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment. Perception & Psychophysics. 3(1). 25–31. 132 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact