Robert MacIntyre

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 705 citations indexed

About

Robert MacIntyre is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert MacIntyre has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 705 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Robert MacIntyre's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). Robert MacIntyre is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). Robert MacIntyre collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Japan and United States. Robert MacIntyre's co-authors include Mark Ferguson, Ann Bies, Karen Katz, Grace Kim, Mitchell P. Marcus, Kenneth J. Zucker, Susan J. Bradley, Susan E. Dickens, Alison Bury and Thomas Bowman and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology and Exceptional Children.

In The Last Decade

Robert MacIntyre

9 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert MacIntyre Canada	5	622	65	57	40	39	11	705
Mark Ferguson United Kingdom	3	624 1.0×	57 0.9×	55 1.0×	43 1.1×	37 0.9×	6	672
Thierry Poibeau France	12	390 0.6×	52 0.8×	74 1.3×	38 0.9×	55 1.4×	56	491
Hrafn Loftsson Iceland	11	497 0.8×	66 1.0×	58 1.0×	35 0.9×	27 0.7×	39	641
Joseph Mariani France	9	479 0.8×	54 0.8×	44 0.8×	50 1.3×	32 0.8×	52	622
Philip Edmonds Canada	10	758 1.2×	129 2.0×	60 1.1×	42 1.1×	71 1.8×	14	881
Jan Odijk Netherlands	8	449 0.7×	78 1.2×	54 0.9×	34 0.8×	26 0.7×	41	592
Valia Kordoni Germany	12	520 0.8×	94 1.4×	48 0.8×	31 0.8×	35 0.9×	61	594
Balázs Kis Sweden	5	341 0.5×	47 0.7×	49 0.9×	24 0.6×	25 0.6×	12	441
Janet Hitzeman United Kingdom	12	478 0.8×	93 1.4×	33 0.6×	19 0.5×	57 1.5×	24	614
Bente Mægaard Denmark	8	425 0.7×	67 1.0×	45 0.8×	37 0.9×	27 0.7×	39	552

Countries citing papers authored by Robert MacIntyre

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert MacIntyre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert MacIntyre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert MacIntyre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert MacIntyre

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert MacIntyre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert MacIntyre. The network helps show where Robert MacIntyre may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert MacIntyre

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert MacIntyre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert MacIntyre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert MacIntyre. Robert MacIntyre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

MacIntyre, Robert. (2020). Citation machines: The use of evidentials in the academic writing of Japanese university students. Aisberg (University of Bergamo). 9. 59–74. 2 indexed citations

2.

MacIntyre, Robert. (2017). The Use of Personal Pronouns in the Writing of Argumentative Essays by EFL Writers. RELC Journal. 50(1). 6–19. 10 indexed citations

3.

MacIntyre, Robert. (2013). Lost in a Forest All Alone: the use of hedges and boosters in the argumentative essays of Japanese university students.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1–24. 1 indexed citations

4.

MacIntyre, Robert. (2010). How do they stand? Research into the representation of stance in academic writing and its implications for pedagogy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 19–26. 1 indexed citations

5.

MacIntyre, Robert. (2007). Revision of a criterion-referenced rating scale used to assess academic writing. 203–219. 3 indexed citations

6.

Bies, Ann, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, & Robert MacIntyre. (1995). Bracketing Guidelines For Treebank II Style Penn Treebank Project. ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania). 198 indexed citations

7.

Marcus, Mitchell P., Grace Kim, Robert MacIntyre, et al.. (1994). The Penn Treebank. 114–114. 467 indexed citations

8.

Atkinson, Leslie, et al.. (1990). Stability of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised factor scores across time.. Psychological Assessment. 2(4). 447–450. 6 indexed citations

9.

Zucker, Kenneth J., et al.. (1989). Effects of neutral toys on sex-typed play in children with gender identity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 17(5). 563–574. 15 indexed citations

10.

MacIntyre, Robert. (1980). Identification of Learning Disabilities in Ontario: A Validity Study.. 1 indexed citations

11.

MacIntyre, Robert. (1972). Inservice Training Through Short Term Conferences. Exceptional Children. 38(5). 412–415. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact