Robert M. Lust

2.8k citations
86 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 26

Robert M. Lust

86 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Robert M. Lust
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 615
  • Developmental Neuroscience 98
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 300
  • Physiology 491
  • Clinical Biochemistry 107
Replace Susanne Rohrbach with:
Susanne Rohrbach Germany
Pamela A. Lucchesi United States
Steve Leu Taiwan
Kensuke Noma Japan
Christophe Beauloye Belgium
Naoharu Iwai Japan
Loren E. Wold United States
Hans Strijdom South Africa
Pei‐Hsun Sung Taiwan
Chikara Goto Japan
Robert M. Lust relative to Susanne Rohrbach Germany Susanne Rohrbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Susanne Rohrbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Lust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Lust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Lust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Lust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Lust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Lust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Lust. The network helps show where Robert M. Lust may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Lust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Lust Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Lust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20214
2 20216
3 2019126
4 201621
5 201323
6 201288
7 201233
8 20107
9 200917
10 200733
11 2006113
12 200021
13 19984
14 19954
15 19946
16 199437
17 19933
18 19913
19 199043
20
Drehimpulstransport durch Magnetfelder und die Abbremsung rotierender Sterne. Mit 4 Textabbildungen
19551

About Robert M. Lust

Robert M. Lust is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Internal Medicine and Surgery, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (20 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (16 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (9 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (615 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (98 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (300 citations), Physiology (491 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (107 citations). Robert M. Lust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jitka A. I. Virag, Laxmansa C. Katwa, W. Randolph Chitwood, Robert C. Noland, Christopher J. Wingard, Joseph R. Elbeery, Christopher L. Wixon, Michael R. Van Scott, You Su Sun and William H. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Circulation, The FASEB Journal and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026