Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.
1979706 citationsRobert J. GlushkoJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performanceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Glushko
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Glushko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Glushko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Glushko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Glushko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Glushko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Glushko. The network helps show where Robert J. Glushko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Glushko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Glushko.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Glushko based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Glushko. Robert J. Glushko is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Glushko, Robert J., et al.. (2017). Creating a Policy Framework for Analytic Access to In-Copyright Works for Non-Consumptive Research.. DH.1 indexed citations
4.
Glushko, Robert J., et al.. (2015). 'Popcorn Tastes Good': Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's 'Amageddon'. Scholarship@Western (Western University).1 indexed citations
Glushko, Robert J., Paul P. Maglio, Teenie Matlock, & Lawrence W. Barsalou. (2008). Categorization in the wild. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12(4). 129–135.44 indexed citations
9.
Wilde, Erik & Robert J. Glushko. (2008). XML fever. Communications of the ACM. 51(7). 40–46.20 indexed citations
Glushko, Robert J., et al.. (2005). Document Engineering: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1.43 indexed citations
12.
Garvey, Patrick B., et al.. (2003). Developing XML Vocabularies for Web Services.1 indexed citations
13.
Glushko, Robert J., et al.. (1998). XML and electronic commerce. ACM SIGMOD Record. 27(4). 21–24.19 indexed citations
14.
Glushko, Robert J., et al.. (1993). Silicon Graphics' IRIS InSight: An SGML Success Story.. Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication. 40(3). 394–402.
15.
Samuelson, Pamela & Robert J. Glushko. (1990). Survey on the Look and Feel Lawsuits.. Communications of the ACM. 33. 483–487.3 indexed citations
16.
Glushko, Robert J.. (1990). Designing a Hypertext Electronic Encyclopedia.. 16(3).1 indexed citations
Glushko, Robert J.. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 5(4). 674–691.706 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.