Robert Gay
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Co-authors
- Qingping LinGuang-Bin HuangGuorui FengH. PetitdemangeFrédéric MonotE. PetitdemangeJ. BallongueG. Raval
- Topics
- Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers)Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers)Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Robert Gay
49 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Artificial Intelligence 504
- Molecular Biology 388
- Biomedical Engineering 317
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 194
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 152
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Gay
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Gay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Gay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Gay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Gay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Gay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Gay. The network helps show where Robert Gay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Gay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Gay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Gay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Gay. Robert Gay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Error Minimized Extreme Learning Machine With Growth of Hidden Nodes and Incremental Learningbreakdown → | 496 |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 185 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Robert Gay
Robert Gay is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Architecture, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers) and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (504 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (152 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (317 citations). Robert Gay has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Qingping Lin, Guang-Bin Huang, Guorui Feng, H. Petitdemange, Frédéric Monot, E. Petitdemange, J. Ballongue, G. Raval, Jun Liu and Chee Kai Chua. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.