Robert G. Spiegelman
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip K. RobinsStephen A. WoodburyRichard W. WestMichael C. KeeleyChristopher J. O’LearyPhillip B. LevineAndy B. Anderson
- Topics
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers)Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Economic ReviewThe Journal of Human Resources
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert G. Spiegelman
17 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Economics and Econometrics 198
- Gender Studies 148
- Sociology and Political Science 77
- General Health Professions 63
- Demography 47
Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Spiegelman
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Spiegelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Spiegelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Spiegelman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Spiegelman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Spiegelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Spiegelman. The network helps show where Robert G. Spiegelman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert G. Spiegelman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert G. Spiegelman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert G. Spiegelman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert G. Spiegelman. Robert G. Spiegelman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | The Washington Reemployment Bonus Experiment: Final Report | 11 |
| 5 | Bonuses to Workers and Employers to Reduce Unemployment: Randomized Trials in Illinois | 113 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | The estimation of labor supply models using experimental data | 67 |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Application of Activity Analysis to Regional Development Planning: A Case Study of Economic Planning in Rural South Central Kentucky | 1 |
| 17 | 6 |
About Robert G. Spiegelman
Robert G. Spiegelman is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Software, having authored 17 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (148 citations), Economics and Econometrics (198 citations) and Demography (47 citations). Robert G. Spiegelman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip K. Robins, Stephen A. Woodbury, Richard W. West, Michael C. Keeley, Christopher J. O’Leary, Phillip B. Levine and Andy B. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Economic Review and The Journal of Human Resources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.