Manuela Rebora

1.6k citations
99 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Manuela Rebora

94 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Manuela Rebora
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Insect Science 365
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 533
  • Genetics 479
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 309
  • Ecology 332
Replace Silvana Piersanti with:
Silvana Piersanti Italy
Philip G. D. Matthews Australia
Gianandrea Salerno Italy
Sven Geiselhardt Germany
Jean‐Luc Boevé Belgium
Günther Pass Austria
Casper J. van der Kooi Netherlands
Robert F. Mitchell United States
J. Roman Arguello United States
Robert A. Haney United States
Manuela Rebora relative to Silvana Piersanti Italy Silvana Piersanti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Silvana Piersanti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Rebora

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Rebora's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Rebora with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Rebora more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Rebora

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Rebora. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Rebora. The network helps show where Manuela Rebora may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Manuela Rebora, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manuela Rebora Line = papers co-authored together Manuela Rebora links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201944
2 201140
3 200838
4 201838
5 201837
6 201733
7 201127
8 201427
9 201826
10 202026
11 202025
12 201124
13 200424
14 201924
15 202321
16 199921
17 201320
18 202120
19 200719
20 200819

About Manuela Rebora

Manuela Rebora is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecology, Insect Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (39 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (26 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (24 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (19 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (14 papers) and Plant and animal studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (365 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (533 citations), Genetics (479 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (309 citations) and Ecology (332 citations). Manuela Rebora has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Elda Gaino, Silvana Piersanti, Gianandrea Salerno, Stanislav N. Gorb, Elena V. Gorb, Elena Gorb, Francesca Frati, Alexander Kovalev, Eric Conti and Tor J. Almaas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Arthropod Structure & Development, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Arthropod-Plant Interactions and Invertebrate Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact