Robert Chote

425 total citations
14 papers, 177 citations indexed

About

Robert Chote is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Chote has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 177 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 4 papers in Accounting and 2 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Robert Chote's work include Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (2 papers). Robert Chote is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (2 papers). Robert Chote collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Robert Chote's co-authors include Stuart Adam, Paul Johnson, Stephen Bond, Gareth D. Myles, James M. Poterba, Richard Blundell, Malcolm Gammie, James A. Mirrlees, Tim Besley and Timothy Besley and has published in prestigious journals such as National Tax Journal and Fiscal Studies.

In The Last Decade

Robert Chote

9 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Chote United Kingdom	5	140	81	46	22	20	14	177
Alan D. Viard United States	10	169 1.2×	101 1.2×	51 1.1×	9 0.4×	25 1.3×	54	206
Michael Godwin United Kingdom	6	209 1.5×	139 1.7×	34 0.7×	29 1.3×	7 0.3×	13	251
Can Sever United States	9	122 0.9×	33 0.4×	39 0.8×	20 0.9×	39 1.9×	32	217
Lucio Castro United States	5	193 1.4×	110 1.4×	43 0.9×	20 0.9×	4 0.2×	12	238
Youssef Benzarti United States	8	243 1.7×	117 1.4×	75 1.6×	18 0.8×	4 0.2×	16	263
Arne Jon Isachsen Norway	4	253 1.8×	132 1.6×	26 0.6×	14 0.6×	8 0.4×	14	285
Laurent Simula France	7	256 1.8×	97 1.2×	103 2.2×	38 1.7×	18 0.9×	19	281
Bert Brys United Kingdom	3	310 2.2×	120 1.5×	23 0.5×	29 1.3×	12 0.6×	5	347
Mario Mansour United States	8	206 1.5×	101 1.2×	24 0.5×	70 3.2×	7 0.3×	24	265
Raymond G. Batina United States	9	211 1.5×	57 0.7×	33 0.7×	50 2.3×	3 0.1×	27	244

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Chote

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Chote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Chote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Chote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Chote

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Chote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Chote. The network helps show where Robert Chote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Chote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Chote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Chote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Chote. Robert Chote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Mirrlees, James A., Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, et al.. (2012). THE MIRRLEES REVIEW: A PROPOSAL FOR SYSTEMATIC TAX REFORM. National Tax Journal. 65(3). 655–683. 19 indexed citations

2.

Mirrlees, James A., Stuart Adam, Timothy Besley, et al.. (2011). The Mirrlees Review: Conclusions and Recommendations for Reform*. Fiscal Studies. 32(3). 331–359. 57 indexed citations

3.

Mirrlees, James A., Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, et al.. (2011). Tax by design. 62 indexed citations

4.

Brewer, Mike, Robert Chote, & Robert Joyce. (2010). Conservatives to recognise one third of marriages in the tax system. 1 indexed citations

5.

Mirrlees, James A., Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, et al.. (2010). Mirrlees Review of tax system recommends radical changes.

6.

Chote, Robert & Carl Emmerson. (2010). No new taxes. 1 indexed citations

7.

Adam, Stuart, Tim Besley, Richard Blundell, et al.. (2010). Dimensions of Tax Design. 23 indexed citations

8.

Chote, Robert, Carl Emmerson, & Gemma Tetlow. (2009). The public finances under Labour. 1 indexed citations

9.

Chote, Robert, Carl Emmerson, & Gemma Tetlow. (2009). The fiscal rules and policy framework. 2 indexed citations

10.

Chote, Robert. (2009). A bust without a boom?. 2 indexed citations

11.

Chote, Robert. (2009). Two parliaments of pain. 1 indexed citations

12.

Chote, Robert, Carl Emmerson, David Miles, & Jonathan Shaw. (2009). More tax increases or spending cuts needed to pay for cost of credit crunch. 1 indexed citations

13.

Chote, Robert, Don Fullerton, Andrew Leicester, & Stephen Smith. (2008). Don't expect much extra revenue from green taxes, says study prepared for the Mirrlees Review.

14.

Adam, Stuart, Mike Brewer, Robert Chote, Carl Emmerson, & Gemma Tetlow. (2007). Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review 2007. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact