Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Johnson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Johnson. The network helps show where Paul Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Johnson. Paul Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sharma, Manoj, et al.. (2017). Applying Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change to Predict Water Consumption Instead of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.. PubMed. 17(1). e00370–e00370.27 indexed citations
3.
Johnson, Paul, et al.. (2017). The Effect of Making Election Day a Holiday: An Original Survey and a Case Study of French Presidential Elections Applied to the U.S. Voting System. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 34(1). 4.1 indexed citations
Johnson, Paul, et al.. (2013). A Pipe Dream? Cost-effective Support for Enabling Students Studying Online. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Paul. (2013). Schoolyard Geographies: The Influence of Object-Play and Place-Making on Relationships. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 3(1). 77–92.2 indexed citations
7.
Speight, Jane, Andrée Woodcock, Matthew Reaney, et al.. (2010). The QoL-Q diabetes' : a novel instrument to assess quality of life for adults with Type 1 diabetes undergoing complex interventions including transplantation. Diabetic Medicine. 27. 3–4.6 indexed citations
8.
O’Connor, Patrick J., William A. Rush, Gestur Davidson, et al.. (2008). Variation in quality of diabetes care at the levels of patient, physician, and clinic.. PubMed. 5(1). A15–A15.38 indexed citations
9.
Keller, René, et al.. (2008). Collaboration and information sharing in NEC networks. 26(6). 653–66.
10.
Williams, Robin & Paul Johnson. (2008). Genetic policing : the use of DNA in criminal investigations. Durham Research Online (Durham University).52 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, Paul, et al.. (2003). Design and production of the METOP satellite IASI corner cube mechanisms. ESASP. 524. 97–103.10 indexed citations
Johnson, Paul, et al.. (1987). Infrared Calibration From High Resolution Planetary and Lunar Measurements. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 19. 871.1 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Paul, et al.. (1986). Smoking in pregnancy: is the message getting through?. PubMed Central. 36(292). 494–5.13 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Paul & William B. Thompson. (1981). Strolling down the garden path: error prone tasks in expert problem solving. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 215–217.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.