Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
COVID‐19 and Inequalities*
2020542 citationsRichard Blundell, Robert Joyce et al.Fiscal Studiesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Joyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Joyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Joyce more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Joyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Joyce. The network helps show where Robert Joyce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Joyce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Joyce.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Joyce based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Joyce. Robert Joyce is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoynes, Hilary, Robert Joyce, & Tom Waters. (2024). Benefits and tax credits. 3(Supplement_1). i1142–i1181.9 indexed citations
Joyce, Robert & Xiaowei Xu. (2020). Sector shut-downs during the coronavirus crisis affect the youngest and lowest paid workers, and women, the most.1 indexed citations
Joyce, Robert, et al.. (2017). Low-income households increasingly exposed to rent increases.1 indexed citations
11.
Emmerson, Carl, Robert Joyce, & David Sturrock. (2017). Working-age incapacity and disability benefits.2 indexed citations
12.
Belfield, Chris, Jonathan Cribb, Andrew Hood, & Robert Joyce. (2015). Nearly two-thirds of children in poverty live in working families.1 indexed citations
13.
Brewer, Mike, James Browne, Andrew Hood, Robert Joyce, & Luke Sibieta. (2013). Better-off hit hardest by recession initially; poor feeling the squeeze now.
Crawford, Claire, Alissa Goodman, Ellen Greaves, & Robert Joyce. (2012). Cohabitation, Marriage and Child Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Marital Status and Child Outcomes in the UK Using the Millennium Cohort Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4(2).9 indexed citations
17.
Brewer, Mike, James Browne, & Robert Joyce. (2011). Universal Credit not enough to prevent a decade of rising poverty.1 indexed citations
18.
Joyce, Robert, et al.. (2011). Long-term effects of recession on living standards yet to be felt.1 indexed citations
19.
Brewer, Mike, Robert Chote, & Robert Joyce. (2010). Conservatives to recognise one third of marriages in the tax system.1 indexed citations
20.
Joyce, Robert. (1991). Clinical Aspects of Aging. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 6(4). 69–70.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.