Robert C. Baker

1.3k total citations
45 papers, 944 citations indexed

About

Robert C. Baker is a scholar working on Food Science, Molecular Biology and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert C. Baker has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 944 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Food Science, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 13 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Robert C. Baker's work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (10 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (7 papers). Robert C. Baker is often cited by papers focused on Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (10 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (7 papers). Robert C. Baker collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Robert C. Baker's co-authors include Stuart Harrad, C.M. Halliwell, Stuart Hunter, D. V. Vadehra, Guangtao Zhang, Hao Luo, R Curtiss, Chongtao Ge, Malcolm C. Bourne and Silin Tang and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Frontiers in Microbiology and British Journal Of Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Robert C. Baker

45 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert C. Baker United States 18 355 236 233 186 159 45 944
Pirjo Rantamäki Finland 13 423 1.2× 126 0.5× 165 0.7× 317 1.7× 56 0.4× 29 924
R.B. Maxcy United States 17 436 1.2× 180 0.8× 47 0.2× 175 0.9× 91 0.6× 72 801
Martha Reyes‐Becerril Mexico 27 216 0.6× 106 0.4× 61 0.3× 359 1.9× 156 1.0× 85 1.8k
Jan Grajewski Poland 20 197 0.6× 98 0.4× 143 0.6× 161 0.9× 771 4.8× 74 1.1k
Zahoor Ul Hassan Qatar 23 275 0.8× 158 0.7× 58 0.2× 211 1.1× 981 6.2× 79 1.4k
B. Jarvis United Kingdom 17 399 1.1× 121 0.5× 36 0.2× 228 1.2× 243 1.5× 34 923
Roger Wheatcroft Canada 24 289 0.8× 318 1.3× 51 0.2× 730 3.9× 725 4.6× 36 1.7k
Thierry Grard France 21 193 0.5× 125 0.5× 87 0.4× 514 2.8× 79 0.5× 48 1.1k
Maria Luisa Cortesi Italy 17 207 0.6× 189 0.8× 65 0.3× 283 1.5× 26 0.2× 39 683

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Baker. The network helps show where Robert C. Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Baker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Baker. Robert C. Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stutt, Richard O. J. H., Matthew D. Castle, Peter J. Markwell, Robert C. Baker, & Christopher A. Gilligan. (2023). An integrated model for pre- and post-harvest aflatoxin contamination in maize. npj Science of Food. 7(1). 60–60. 15 indexed citations
2.
Wu, Xingwen, Hao Luo, Chongtao Ge, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of multiplex nanopore sequencing for Salmonella serotype prediction and antimicrobial resistance gene and virulence gene detection. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13. 1073057–1073057. 15 indexed citations
3.
Imanian, Behzad, John Donaghy, Sanjay Gummalla, et al.. (2022). The power, potential, benefits, and challenges of implementing high-throughput sequencing in food safety systems. npj Science of Food. 6(1). 35–35. 22 indexed citations
4.
Wu, Xingwen, Hao Luo, Feng Xu, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of Salmonella Serotype Prediction With Multiplex Nanopore Sequencing. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12. 637771–637771. 12 indexed citations
5.
Xu, Feng, Chongtao Ge, Shaoting Li, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of nanopore sequencing technology to identify Salmonella enterica Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf and Orion var. 15+, 34+. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 346. 109167–109167. 11 indexed citations
6.
Godefroy, Samuel Benrejeb, Virginie Barrère, Jérémie Théolier, et al.. (2020). Summary of the AOAC-Sponsored Workshop Series Related to the Global Understanding of Food Fraud (GUFF): Mobilization of Resources for Food Authenticity Assurance and Food Fraud Prevention and Mitigation. Journal of AOAC International. 103(2). 470–479. 5 indexed citations
7.
Xu, Feng, Chongtao Ge, Hao Luo, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of real-time nanopore sequencing for Salmonella serotype prediction. Food Microbiology. 89. 103452–103452. 18 indexed citations
9.
Haiminen, Niina, Stefan Edlund, D. D. Chambliss, et al.. (2019). Food authentication from shotgun sequencing reads with an application on high protein powders. npj Science of Food. 3(1). 24–24. 26 indexed citations
10.
Tang, Silin, Renato H. Orsi, Hao Luo, et al.. (2019). Assessment and Comparison of Molecular Subtyping and Characterization Methods for Salmonella. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10. 1591–1591. 61 indexed citations
11.
Weimer, Bart C., Dylan Storey, Christopher A. Elkins, et al.. (2016). Defining the food microbiome for authentication, safety, and process management. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 60(5/6). 1:1–1:13. 14 indexed citations
12.
Lambertini, Elisabetta, et al.. (2015). Quantitative assessment of human and pet exposure to Salmonella associated with dry pet foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 216. 79–90. 26 indexed citations
13.
Baker, Robert C., et al.. (2014). Framework for Managing Mycotoxin Risks in the Food Industry. Journal of Food Protection. 77(12). 2181–2188. 5 indexed citations
14.
Botsford, James L., et al.. (1997). Assay for Toxic Chemicals Using Bacteria. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 59(6). 1000–1009. 9 indexed citations
15.
Baker, Robert C.. (1990). Survival of Salmonella enteritidis on and in shelled eggs, liquid eggs and cooked egg products.. 10(5). 273–275. 41 indexed citations
16.
Delaquis, Pascal, Robert C. Baker, & A.R. McCurdy. (1986). Microbiological Stability of Pasteurized Ham Subjected to a Secondary Treatment in Retort Pouches. Journal of Food Protection. 49(1). 42–46. 2 indexed citations
17.
Rizvi, Syed S. H., et al.. (1983). Selected Rheological Properties of pH‐Adjusted or Succinylated Egg Albumen. Journal of Food Science. 48(5). 1395–1399. 16 indexed citations
18.
Baker, Robert C., et al.. (1983). Quality Comparison of Thermoprocessed Fishery Products in Cans and Retortable Pouches. Journal of Food Science. 48(5). 1521–1525. 33 indexed citations
19.
Vadehra, D. V., et al.. (1973). The Metabolism of 14 C Aflatoxins in Laying Hens. Poultry Science. 52(4). 1302–1309. 29 indexed citations
20.
Baker, Robert C. & W.J. Stadelman. (1958). Chicken Egg Chalazae-Strain and Individual Hen Variations and Their Relation to Internal Quality. Poultry Science. 37(3). 558–564. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026