Robert A. Reeves

13 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Robert A. Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Marketing 118
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Clinical Psychology 103
  • Literature and Literary Theory 50
  • Social Psychology 79
Replace Kurt P. Frey with:
Kurt P. Frey United States
Pamela H. Pearson United States
Victoria C. Oleynick United States
Jannine D. Lasaleta United States
Eun-Sun Lee South Korea
Jiangqun Liao China
Melanie Rudd United States
Hila Riemer Israel
Ya Hui Michelle See Singapore
John H. Yost United States
Robert A. Reeves relative to Kurt P. Frey United States Kurt P. Frey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Kurt P. Frey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Reeves. The network helps show where Robert A. Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Reeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. Reeves Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. Reeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2012166
2
Turkish version of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): reliability, validity, and factorial structure
200459
3 198738
4 201235
5 20049
6 20139
7 19848
8 19793
9 19853
10 19772
11
An Academic Resource in Low Supply and High Demand: A Survey of Community College Recruitment Plans of General Education Faculty over the Next Five Years.
19862
12 20121
13 19781
14 20120

About Robert A. Reeves

Robert A. Reeves is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Social Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 14 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (118 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations) and Social Psychology (79 citations). Robert A. Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Roy C. Martin, John Gountas, Sandra Gountas, Kemal Sayar, Samet Köse, İsmail Ak, İsmet Kırpınar, Nazan Aydın, Thomas R. Przybeck and C. Robert Cloninger. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Marketing, Death Studies, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact