Robert A. Dobie
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Sensory Systems top 0.05%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.05%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Otorhinolaryngology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Michael J. WilsonCharles I. BerlínWayne KatonConnie SakaiRobert K. JacklerRichard K. GurgelGerald R. PopelkaJoan Russo
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (56 papers)Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (46 papers)Noise Effects and Management (39 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandPoland
In The Last Decade
Robert A. Dobie
150 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.9k
- Sensory Systems 2.8k
- Speech and Hearing 1.5k
- Neurology 1.3k
- Otorhinolaryngology 535
Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Dobie
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Dobie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Dobie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Dobie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Dobie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Dobie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Dobie. The network helps show where Robert A. Dobie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert A. Dobie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert A. Dobie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert A. Dobie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert A. Dobie. Robert A. Dobie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 54 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 203 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 255 | |
| 9 | Tinnitus and Depression | 4 |
| 10 | Economic compensation for hearing loss. | 6 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 101 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 115 | |
| 19 | Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders. | 23 |
| 20 | Safety of hospital vs home care of infant tracheotomies. | 3 |
About Robert A. Dobie
Robert A. Dobie is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 150 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (56 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (46 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.8k citations), Speech and Hearing (1.5k citations) and Neurology (1.3k citations). Robert A. Dobie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Wilson, Charles I. Berlín, Wayne Katon, Connie Sakai, Robert K. Jackler, Richard K. Gurgel, Gerald R. Popelka, Joan Russo, Susan J. Norton and Howard J. Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.