Janet E. Shanks

593 citations
23 papers · 465 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Shanks

23 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Janet E. Shanks
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Otorhinolaryngology 233
  • Sensory Systems 173
  • Speech and Hearing 107
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 227
  • Neurology 86
Replace Huw R. Cooper with:
Huw R. Cooper United Kingdom
Gabrielle R. Merchant United States
Francisco Javier Cervera‐Paz Spain
Bradly J. Edgerton United States
S. Hoth Germany
Kim S. Schairer United States
Veronica Miorelli Italy
Patricia S. Jeng United States
John C. Ellison United States
Rolf D. Battmer Germany
Janet E. Shanks relative to Huw R. Cooper United Kingdom Huw R. Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Huw R. Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Shanks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Shanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Shanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Shanks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Shanks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Shanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Shanks. The network helps show where Janet E. Shanks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Shanks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Shanks Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Shanks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Efficacy of 3 Commonly Used Hearing Aid Circuits
20171
2 20073
3 200224
4 200237
5 200115
6 20001
7 19971
8 199226
9 199124
10 199149
11 19872
12 198622
13 19869
14 19852
15 198434
16 198444
17 19811
18 19819
19 198156
20 197616

About Janet E. Shanks

Janet E. Shanks is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (10 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (7 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (233 citations), Sensory Systems (173 citations), Speech and Hearing (107 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (227 citations) and Neurology (86 citations). Janet E. Shanks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Wilson, David J. Lilly, Clough Shelton, David W. Williams, William J. Ryan, Laura Schulte, Patricia G. Stelmachowicz, Kathryn L. Beauchaine, Christine E. McLaren and Gene W. Bratt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing, Cortex, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America and Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026