B. Z. Rappaport

733 total citations
21 papers, 582 citations indexed

About

B. Z. Rappaport is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Z. Rappaport has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 582 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Speech and Hearing and 6 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in B. Z. Rappaport's work include Noise Effects and Management (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers). B. Z. Rappaport is often cited by papers focused on Noise Effects and Management (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers). B. Z. Rappaport collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Greece. B. Z. Rappaport's co-authors include Stephen A. Fausti, Richard Frey, Martin A. Schechter, Robert E. Brummett, Hasida Ben‐Zur, Gideon Uretzky, Robert C. Marshall, Thomas Ward, David W. Williams and Michael Fry and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Brain and Language.

In The Last Decade

B. Z. Rappaport

21 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. Z. Rappaport United States 12 316 287 175 66 52 21 582
Noel D. Matkin United States 9 349 1.1× 236 0.8× 95 0.5× 50 0.8× 86 1.7× 22 539
Roger M. Ellingson United States 12 232 0.7× 201 0.7× 71 0.4× 56 0.8× 31 0.6× 28 330
Paula J. Myers United States 15 431 1.4× 439 1.5× 174 1.0× 168 2.5× 56 1.1× 23 760
Robert C. Fifer United States 12 364 1.2× 255 0.9× 131 0.7× 69 1.0× 71 1.4× 27 490
Thomas S. Rees United States 13 554 1.8× 444 1.5× 304 1.7× 181 2.7× 52 1.0× 14 895
Thomas Behrens Denmark 9 482 1.5× 352 1.2× 183 1.0× 42 0.6× 131 2.5× 21 596
Ross J. Roeser United States 12 234 0.7× 156 0.5× 75 0.4× 51 0.8× 137 2.6× 47 520
Nandini Govil United States 6 320 1.0× 242 0.8× 241 1.4× 51 0.8× 10 0.2× 9 483
Daniela Gil Brazil 12 304 1.0× 179 0.6× 122 0.7× 52 0.8× 47 0.9× 82 431
Angus Waddell United Kingdom 8 341 1.1× 439 1.5× 66 0.4× 351 5.3× 30 0.6× 13 590

Countries citing papers authored by B. Z. Rappaport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Z. Rappaport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Z. Rappaport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Z. Rappaport more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Z. Rappaport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Z. Rappaport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Z. Rappaport. The network helps show where B. Z. Rappaport may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Z. Rappaport

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Z. Rappaport. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Z. Rappaport based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Z. Rappaport. B. Z. Rappaport is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Larson, Vernon D., David W. Williams, William G. Henderson, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of 3 Commonly Used Hearing Aid Circuits. 1 indexed citations
2.
Larson, Vernon D., David W. Williams, William G. Henderson, et al.. (2002). A Multi-Center, Double Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Benefit from Three Commonly Used Hearing Aid Circuits*. Ear and Hearing. 23(4). 269–276. 24 indexed citations
3.
Slobodin, Gleb, Itzhak Rosner, Michael Rozenbaum, et al.. (2000). Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma: Comment on the article by Poormoghim et al. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 43(11). 2618–2618. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ben‐Zur, Hasida, et al.. (2000). Coping Strategies, Life Style Changes, and Pessimism after Open-Heart Surgery. Health & Social Work. 25(3). 201–209. 67 indexed citations
6.
Rappaport, B. Z., Stephen A. Fausti, Martin A. Schechter, & Richard Frey. (1986). A Prospective Study of High-Frequency Auditory Function in Patients Receiving Oral Neomycin. Scandinavian Audiology. 15(2). 67–71. 13 indexed citations
7.
Schechter, Martin A., Stephen A. Fausti, B. Z. Rappaport, & Richard Frey. (1986). Age categorization of high-frequency auditory threshold data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 79(3). 767–771. 44 indexed citations
8.
Marshall, Robert C., et al.. (1985). Self-monitoring behavior in a case of severe auditory agnosia with aphasia. Brain and Language. 24(2). 297–313. 47 indexed citations
9.
Schechter, Martin A., Stephen A. Fausti, B. Z. Rappaport, & Richard Frey. (1985). High-Frequency Auditory Sensitivity and Noise Exposure. Seminars in Hearing. 6(4). 379–386. 1 indexed citations
10.
Rappaport, B. Z., Stephen A. Fausti, Martin A. Schechter, Richard Frey, & Pamela Hartigan. (1985). Detection of Ototoxicity by High-Frequency Auditory Evaluation. Seminars in Hearing. 6(4). 369–377. 6 indexed citations
11.
Fausti, Stephen A., Richard Frey, B. Z. Rappaport, & Martin A. Schechter. (1985). High-Frequency Audiometry With an Earphone Transducer. Seminars in Hearing. 6(4). 347–357. 6 indexed citations
12.
Fausti, Stephen A., B. Z. Rappaport, Martin A. Schechter, et al.. (1984). Detection of aminoglycoside ototoxicity by high-frequency auditory evaluation: Selected case studies. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 5(3). 177–182. 49 indexed citations
13.
Fausti, Stephen A., et al.. (1984). Early detection of cisplatin ototoxicity selected case reports. Cancer. 53(2). 224–231. 86 indexed citations
14.
Fausti, Stephen A., B. Z. Rappaport, Martin A. Schechter, & Richard Frey. (1982). An investigation of the validity of high-frequency audition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 71(3). 646–649. 13 indexed citations
15.
Rappaport, B. Z., Stephen A. Fausti, Martin A. Schechter, & Richard Frey. (1982). Investigation of interaural attenuation factors for frequencies above 8000 Hz. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 72(4). 1297–1298. 7 indexed citations
16.
Fausti, Stephen A., et al.. (1981). The Effects of Impulsive Noise Upon Human Hearing Sensitivity (8 to 20 kHz). Scandinavian Audiology. 10(1). 21–29. 24 indexed citations
17.
Fausti, Stephen A., et al.. (1981). The effects of noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8000 to 20 000 Hz. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 69(5). 1343–1349. 76 indexed citations
18.
Fausti, Stephen A., et al.. (1980). Effects of steady-state noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8000 to 20 000 Hz. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 41(6). 427–432. 7 indexed citations
19.
Fausti, Stephen A., et al.. (1979). A system for evaluating auditory function from 8000–20 000 Hz. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 66(6). 1713–1718. 88 indexed citations
20.
Rappaport, B. Z., et al.. (1976). Acoustic Reflex Threshold Measurement in Hearing Aid Selection. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 102(3). 129–132. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026