Gene W. Bratt

593 total citations
24 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Gene W. Bratt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Gene W. Bratt has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 papers in Sensory Systems and 13 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Gene W. Bratt's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (17 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (13 papers). Gene W. Bratt is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (17 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (13 papers). Gene W. Bratt collaborates with scholars based in United States and Greece. Gene W. Bratt's co-authors include Stephen A. Fausti, Jane S. Gordon, Wendy J. Helt, David W. Williams, Kelly M. Reavis, Dawn Konrad‐Martin, Douglas Noffsinger, David S. Phillips, Larry E. Humes and Todd A. Ricketts and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

In The Last Decade

Gene W. Bratt

24 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Gene W. Bratt

NEURO

OTORH

Ying Kong China

Thomas Hocke Germany

Francesca Forli Italy

Gerald I. Schuchman United States

Meredith A. Rooth United States

Huw Cooper United Kingdom

Jennifer Henderson Sabes United States

Lina Motlagh Zadeh United States

L García-Ibáñez Spain

G. J. Sutton United Kingdom

Ying Kong China

Gene W. Bratt

339 ×0.9

250 ×1.0

130 ×0.6

24 ×0.3

NEURO

76 ×1.2

OTORH

Citations per year, relative to Gene W. Bratt Gene W. Bratt (= 1×) peers Ying Kong

Countries citing papers authored by Gene W. Bratt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene W. Bratt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene W. Bratt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene W. Bratt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gene W. Bratt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene W. Bratt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene W. Bratt. The network helps show where Gene W. Bratt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gene W. Bratt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gene W. Bratt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gene W. Bratt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gene W. Bratt. Gene W. Bratt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Margolis, Robert H., Gene W. Bratt, M. Patrick Feeney, Mead C. Killion, & George L. Saly. (2018). Home Hearing Test: Within-Subjects Threshold Variability. Ear and Hearing. 39(5). 906–909. 12 indexed citations

Larson, Vernon D., David W. Williams, William G. Henderson, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of 3 Commonly Used Hearing Aid Circuits. 1 indexed citations

Margolis, Robert H., Mead C. Killion, Gene W. Bratt, & George L. Saly. (2016). Validation of the Home Hearing Test™. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 27(5). 416–420. 25 indexed citations

Smith, Sherri L., Todd A. Ricketts, Rachel A. McArdle, et al.. (2013). Style Preference Survey: A Report on the Psychometric Properties and a Cross-Validation Experiment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 24(2). 89–104. 2 indexed citations

Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Kenneth E. James, Jane S. Gordon, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of Audiometric Threshold Shift Criteria for Ototoxicity Monitoring. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(5). 301–314. 21 indexed citations

Dille, Marilyn F., Dawn Konrad‐Martin, Frederick J. Gallun, et al.. (2010). Tinnitus Onset Rates from Chemotherapeutic Agents and Ototoxic Antibiotics: Results of a Large Prospective Study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(6). 409–417. 49 indexed citations

Ricketts, Todd A., et al.. (2009). Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 46(5). 603–603. 37 indexed citations

Reavis, Kelly M., David S. Phillips, Stephen A. Fausti, et al.. (2008). Factors Affecting Sensitivity of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 29(6). 875–893. 49 indexed citations

Bratt, Gene W., et al.. (2007). NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial and Follow-Up: Coupler and Real-Ear Measurement. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(4). 282–291. 3 indexed citations

10.

Bratt, Gene W., et al.. (2007). NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial and Follow-Up: Background. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(4). 274–281. 5 indexed citations

11.

Kricos, Patricia B., Sue Ann Erdman, Gene W. Bratt, & David W. Williams. (2007). Psychosocial Correlates of Hearing Aid Adjustment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(4). 304–322. 18 indexed citations

12.

Shanks, Janet E., Richard H. Wilson, Patricia G. Stelmachowicz, Gene W. Bratt, & David W. Williams. (2007). Speech-Recognition Performance after Long-Term Hearing Aid Use. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(4). 292–303. 3 indexed citations

13.

Takahashi, Gail A., et al.. (2007). Subjective Measures of Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA Follow-Up Study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(4). 323–349. 65 indexed citations

14.

Fausti, Stephen A., Wendy J. Helt, David S. Phillips, et al.. (2003). Early Detection of Ototoxicity Using 1/6th-Octave Steps. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 14(8). 444–450. 33 indexed citations

15.

Larson, Vernon D., David W. Williams, William G. Henderson, et al.. (2002). A Multi-Center, Double Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Benefit from Three Commonly Used Hearing Aid Circuits*. Ear and Hearing. 23(4). 269–276. 24 indexed citations

16.

Bratt, Gene W., et al.. (2002). Coupler and Real-Ear Measurement of Hearing Aid Gain and Output in the NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial. Ear and Hearing. 23(4). 308–315. 10 indexed citations

17.

Sammeth, Carol A., et al.. (1993). Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.. PubMed. 4(1). 33–41. 5 indexed citations

18.

Beasley, Daniel S., Gene W. Bratt, & William F. Rintelmann. (1980). Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Sentential Stimuli. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 23(4). 722–731. 28 indexed citations

19.

Bess, Fred H., Gale W. Miller, Michael E. Glasscock, & Gene W. Bratt. (1980). Unexplained Conductive Hearing Loss. Southern Medical Journal. 73(3). 335–338. 18 indexed citations

20.

Bratt, Gene W., Fred H. Bess, Gale W. Miller, & Michael E. Glasscock. (1979). Glomus Tumor of the Middle Ear: Origin, Symptomatology, and Treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 44(1). 121–135. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact